I guess one of the big differences for choosing MX240 over MX80 would be
the Dual RE capability on the MX240.
I have been told by our SE that the MX80 will be able to be clustered
like the SRX style cluster in the future.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
* Richard A. Steenbergen:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:51:05AM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'm a bit puzzled by the EOL policies. According to
http://www.juniper.net/support/eol/junos.html, JUNOS 8.5 has its
first transition event on 2010-11-16 (whatever End of Engineering
means).
Hi,
we are a small ISP with a Cisco-only core at the moment, consisting of
two 6500 series and a couple of Cat2960G aggregation switches. We are
looking into deploying to a small IX in the area, which is at the same
location as two of our upstreams. So we are going to throw a second
fiber to the
It sounds like the EX4200 would be a fit for you if you're only doing l2, as
you mentioned it doesn't have a big FIB for a large amount of routes.. You
said that 16k routes would suffice for you, so perhaps you are doing L3 but
you're not importing full route feeds in this network area. I somehow
The bug situation is getting better though, I think...
We have EX-4200s in our environment and aside from an earlier
aggregated-ethernet bug and a hardware issue, they have been rock-solid. In
our environment they are L2 Q-in-Q only, no routing. We have MPLS licenses for
the units in our
Hi,
We also choose the Ex4200 as a backhaul solution, using RSVP based CCC's.
On top of that we strip off the outer vlan at the far end port, and push a new
and unique outer vlan tag on the connection towards our Mx240's.
So it runs as a layer 2 PE, with no problems so far.
I think the
We currently have some EX4200 deployed in some VC and non VC setups - really
working great for our needs. We are running them pure layer2 currently
although deploying them layer3 (OSPF) at customer site currently as well in
VC setup. No issues encountered at all (probably because we're running
Will be rolling a EX4200 non-vc into production as a customer agg router next
week. Yes the dual host-swap PS, the hot swap fan tray, uplink module (mine
will be 4X1GE with LX media). I'm quite happy with these boxes. I will be
rolling more 4200's /w VC into production this summer.
-b
On Friday 14 May 2010 04:29:34 pm William Jackson wrote:
I guess one of the big differences for choosing MX240
over MX80 would be the Dual RE capability on the MX240.
I have been told by our SE that the MX80 will be able to
be clustered like the SRX style cluster in the future.
For some
Chris Evans chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
many thanks for your answer...
It sounds like the EX4200 would be a fit for you if you're only doing l2, as
you mentioned it doesn't have a big FIB for a large amount of routes.. You
said that 16k routes would suffice for you, so perhaps
10 matches
Mail list logo
