Some feature 10.1 support but 9.6 not supported:
1. LAG
2. LAG in JSRP
3. Many ALG (9.6 only support FTP/TFTP)
4.Static/Source NAT rule number limit (9.6 only support 8 rules per
rule-set)
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Fahad Khan fahad.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
Is there any
Hi Fahad,
Chen gave a very good answer.
Though It also depends on which platform you talk of. E. g. SRX3400 could
not support more than 1M sessions until 10.0. Also some overall JUNOS things
were added in 10.0 like interface ranges.
There is a very good paper which answers your question, called
On Sunday 16 May 2010 05:38:59 pm Humair Ali wrote:
Hi Mark
I think it is best to have the IBGP session between the
RR in a different ibgp session.
That's what I said when I was replying to the OP - iBGP
sessions between route reflectors in a cluster would
typically be implemented
One of the projects on my back burner is to get a new remote serial console for
my network nodes. Anyone have suggestions? We'd like something that logs
console output to help provide forensics when there are problems. -so I'd
rather not go the usb serial adapter route.
Will
On Sunday 16 May 2010 09:26:34 pm Humair Ali wrote:
Then depending on what is behind the RR client end and
how the design is planned, I would use Local pref set
for servers behind RR Client POP 1 for inbound traffic
set up respectively accross the POP , so that if traffic
comes in from
We use some of the kit from these guys and find it great :
http://opengear.com/
http://opengear.com/Brent
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 9:58 PM, OBrien, Will obri...@missouri.edu wrote:
One of the projects on my back burner is to get a new remote serial console
for my network nodes. Anyone have
If I understand good, you need device that will help to connect with network
devices using serial port. I think that will help you:
http://www.digi.com/products/consoleservers/digicm.jsp#overview
2010/5/16 Brent Paddon br...@overthewire.com.au
We use some of the kit from these guys and find it
The SRX is quite new in the market and for my opinion it's a great product
with high capabilities although he has some mature problems.
I have installed and configured quite a lot of these and they are working
fine as long u know what to except!
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
Did anyone has encountered the need to implement an IPSec HA solution using
SRX?
I have 2 SRX machines, one in the main office along with 2 ISP connections
and a branch office with only 1 ISP connection,
I need to configure HA solution, using IPSec. Any ideas?
Tal M
I recommend the Avocent Cyclades Advanced Console Servers (ACS) line.
The run on Linux, can log to local RAM as well as PCMCIA flash,
syslog, etc. and come in 1, 4, 8, 16, 32, or 48 port varieties, AC,
dual-AC, and DC powered.
http://www.avocent.com/Products/Category/Serial_Appliances.aspx
On 17/05/2010, at 6:29 AM, Techtalm wrote:
Hi,
Did anyone has encountered the need to implement an IPSec HA solution using
SRX?
I have 2 SRX machines, one in the main office along with 2 ISP connections
and a branch office with only 1 ISP connection,
I need to configure HA solution, using
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Johan Borch wrote:
Hi,
My company started to switch over to Juniper about half a year ago, we
do run a lot of the SRX-series and I don't think I've seen a product
with so many bugs before, is this a common Juniper problem have they
always been this
12 matches
Mail list logo
