Re: [j-nsp] OSPF default-lsa

the default-lsa is not generated because of Junos 'active backbone detection' http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos94/swconfig-routing/configuring-the-backbone-area-and-other-areas.html "Active backbone detection is implemented to verify that area border routers are connected to th

[j-nsp] OSPF default-lsa

I've been having some weirdness with OSPF default-lsa's, in that when a hosts only other area 0 OSPF peer goes away the default drops, despite the fact that the host has full routes via BGP. Is there any way to say that I *always* want a default-lsa sent, no matter what my OSPF adjacencies may be?

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX80 IRB

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 06:52:14PM +0200, Tim Vollebregt wrote: > We have just received a Juniper MX80 and are building the configuration. > The machine is running Junos 10.2 R1.8 > > The issue we are experiencing is that the IRB interface seems to be > not working, although it seems to be config

[j-nsp] Juniper MX80 IRB

Hi All, We have just received a Juniper MX80 and are building the configuration. The machine is running Junos 10.2 R1.8 The issue we are experiencing is that the IRB interface seems to be not working, although it seems to be configured correctly. Configuration: ge-1/0/0 { unit 0 {

Re: [j-nsp] third party SFPs?

On Jul 24, 2010, at 8:06 PM, matthew zeier wrote: > I'm looking for an alternate source for Juniper optics (MX240), specifically: > > SFP-1GE-LX > SFP-1GE-LH > SFP-1GE-SX > XFP-10G-S > > Do you have something that would match that? Buying from Juniper is a lot of > money. > __

Re: [j-nsp] SRX3400/3600 Stabie Code Recommendations?

You have to be cautious with the 'that command works' in SRX There are a number of things that you can turn 'on' in the SRX, and the UI gives you the feedback that it's working, but it actually doesn't turn on the functionality, because it's not supported etc On Jul 24, 2010, at 18:15