You might be out of luck as there is a hardware change.
-David
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> I recently picked up (due to being an idiot who forgot to *read*) a
> non-M SSG550 intended for the lab.
>
> I've put a J-series CF in it and it boots through to "Initializing
Looking to hear any war stories people have (good or bad) with the
EX8200 platform. Planning to evaluate it for dense 1G L2 aggregation,
and wanted to see if there were any big warning signs to watch out
for.
- Darrell
___
juniper-nsp mailing list junipe
I tried with vpls configuration and it worked neatly, had to turn on bgp, ospf
and rsvp, now I can transport any vlan from site to site, and even add one site
without disrupting traffic, point-to-multipoint and link redundancy are main
benefits.
-Original Message-
From: Herro91 [mailt
Hi Harris,
That looks pretty good to me : )
Cheers,
Ben
On 04/10/2010, at 7:06 PM, Harris Hui wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
>
> I had performed the iPerf UDP test, do you think is it normal for the 100Mbps
> link?
>
> Host A (10.16.xx.58) <-> EX 4200 Switch <-->
Hi All
can someone tell me if QinQ traffic can be Transported through VPLS without
specifying the inner VLAN tag in the interface configuration ?
the used hardware is M120 .
Regards
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.
5 matches
Mail list logo