Re: [j-nsp] Non-M SSG5X0 & JunOS

2010-10-04 Thread David Gao
You might be out of luck as there is a hardware change. -David On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Julien Goodwin wrote: > I recently picked up (due to being an idiot who forgot to *read*) a > non-M SSG550 intended for the lab. > > I've put a J-series CF in it and it boots through to "Initializing

[j-nsp] EX8200 experience

2010-10-04 Thread Darrell Hyde
Looking to hear any war stories people have (good or bad) with the EX8200 platform. Planning to evaluate it for dense 1G L2 aggregation, and wanted to see if there were any big warning signs to watch out for. - Darrell ___ juniper-nsp mailing list junipe

Re: [j-nsp] ethernet vlans over redundant carrier networks

2010-10-04 Thread Correa Adolfo
I tried with vpls configuration and it worked neatly, had to turn on bgp, ospf and rsvp, now I can transport any vlan from site to site, and even add one site without disrupting traffic, point-to-multipoint and link redundancy are main benefits. -Original Message- From: Herro91 [mailt

Re: [j-nsp] J6350 Jumbo frame MTU and OSPF setting

2010-10-04 Thread Ben Dale
Hi Harris, That looks pretty good to me : ) Cheers, Ben On 04/10/2010, at 7:06 PM, Harris Hui wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for your suggestion. > > I had performed the iPerf UDP test, do you think is it normal for the 100Mbps > link? > > Host A (10.16.xx.58) <-> EX 4200 Switch <-->

[j-nsp] transparent VLANs

2010-10-04 Thread ibariouen khalid
Hi All can someone tell me if QinQ traffic can be Transported through VPLS without specifying the inner VLAN tag in the interface configuration ? the used hardware is M120 . Regards ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.