Hi Guys,
I am starting to play with BGP and have set up some communities to separate
customer, peer and transit routes. I am trying to figure out how to allow
customers to send me a blackhole community number and then blackhole this.
Does anyone have any examples? I have set up most of my
Hey all,
On the Juniper product page for the SRX650 under interfaces it lists:
2 x 10 GbE SFP+ / 10 GbE Base-T Copper
I've found some obscure references to the PIM - code SRX-GP-2XE-SFPP-TX
Which seems to suggest you get 2 * SFP+ and 2 * 10GBase-T. That is a little
odd.
Has anyone used
On 20/10/10 23:20, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Hey all,
On the Juniper product page for the SRX650 under interfaces it lists:
2 x 10 GbE SFP+ / 10 GbE Base-T Copper
I've found some obscure references to the PIM - code SRX-GP-2XE-SFPP-TX
Which seems to suggest you get 2 * SFP+ and 2 *
10g-base-t phy draws to much power to go in an sfp+ port. Probably looks like
dual personality port on a switch, but no, haven't seen one.
Joel's widget number 2
On Oct 20, 2010, at 5:20, Skeeve Stevens ske...@eintellego.net wrote:
Hey all,
On the Juniper product page for the SRX650 under
Hello Harry,
Thank you for your valuable help. Your reply covers most of the questions I had
related to this topic.
Could you possibly give me a feedback about why when the vrf-table-label is not
configured the only direct routes (on multi-access) that are advertised are
those having an
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Nick Ryce nick.r...@lumison.net wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am starting to play with BGP and have set up some communities to separate
customer, peer and transit routes. I am trying to figure out how to allow
customers to send me a blackhole community number and then
People,
We have a M7i with built in Tunnel interface - 800 Mbps.
We need to create a logical interface to interconnect the default
logical system and a created one ... called R1.
Router# set logical-systems R1
We need to establish a BGP connection between the two logical systems
using
There use to be a great page up at www.secsup.org that provided examples
of exactly this, but I can't seem to load the page anymore.
Anyhow, for your customer, they could add a static route on their router
for the block they want to null route, and 'tag' it with, say, 666 (using
the 'tag'
Thanks for all the replies and help :)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) [mailto:j...@probe-networks.de]
Sent: 20 October 2010 16:03
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP Blackhole communities
Hi,
its easy:
- you need multihop
Thanks a lot Dave.
It works for me.
Hi,
You could do this...
set logical-systems R1 interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 1 encapsulation ethernet
set logical-systems R1 interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 1 peer-unit 2
set logical-systems R1 interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 1 family inet address
100.100.100.1/24
and
Hi,
its easy:
- you need multihop on internal bgp sessions
- configure dsc:
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.10.20.1/32 {
destination 10.10.20.2;
}
}
}
Add policy for blackhole filter:
# show policy-options policy-statement blackholefilter
term black {
On 10/20/10 10:45, David Ball wrote:
There use to be a great page up at www.secsup.org that provided examples
of exactly this, but I can't seem to load the page anymore.
former co-worker shutdown the server i think :( boo.
I have a rough copy:
If I follow, by learning a route from the ce whether by static, ospf, bgp, etc,
the PE is able to bind that route to the CE next-hop. IIRC, by learning at
least one such a route the direct can be advertised when using vrf-target.
Note that in the event of a ping (coming in as mpls from the
Hi,
You could do this...
set logical-systems R1 interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 1 encapsulation ethernet
set logical-systems R1 interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 1 peer-unit 2
set logical-systems R1 interfaces lt-1/2/0 unit 1 family inet address
100.100.100.1/24
and then
set logical-systems R2 interfaces
I'm trying to understand more about Juniper MX architecture, in response
to a failure we recently saw.
The event starts with an RE panic, which caused a failure over to the
redundant RE. JTAC noticed some fabric errors showing up, and concluded
that a failing FPC had caused the RE to panic, and
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) wrote:
Hi,
its easy:
- you need multihop on internal bgp sessions
On external BGP sessions you mean. The issue is that by default JUNOS
doesn't let you arbitrarily rewrite next-hops on regular EBGP learned
routes,
On 10/20/10 15:24, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) wrote:
Hi,
its easy:
- you need multihop on internal bgp sessions
On external BGP sessions you mean. The issue is that by default JUNOS
doesn't let you arbitrarily
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:23:23PM -0400, Chris Morrow wrote:
4) reset next-hop as you ship the route internally to IBGP neighbors
(see ... the Wayne Gustavus's (verizon) talk from NANOG32 in Reston:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog32/presentations/soricelli.pdf)
there are, as RAS is
On 10/20/10 17:03, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:23:23PM -0400, Chris Morrow wrote:
4) reset next-hop as you ship the route internally to IBGP neighbors
(see ... the Wayne Gustavus's (verizon) talk from NANOG32 in Reston:
Anybody that can provide as to how to replace a m10 hard disk? one of them
failed.
any feedback is greatly appreciated.
Fernando Atilano| Transtelco| Networking Support
MX 52.656.257.1114
US1.915.217.2286
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Thanks a lot Harry.
Regards.
Javier Ger
Hornos 690 - Buenos Aires - Argentina
Tel +54.11.5530.4531
Cel +54.9.11.3926.5017
j...@cablevision.com.ar
www.cablevision.com.ar
-Mensaje original-
De: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 20 de Octubre de 2010 12:56
Hey,
With the SRX-GP-16GE only being about 2K, I think I will just do 4
etherchannels from the switch to the SRX.
There is just no cost justification.
...Skeeve
Skeeve Stevens, Chief Executive Officer
eintellego Pty Ltd -
22 matches
Mail list logo
