All:
We have a two site VPLS setup using virtual-switches. Site A has an IRB in
the bridge-domain in the virtual-switch configuration. All is good when the
two
PEs have a BGP session and the LSPs are up between the two PEs.
However, when Site B becomes unreachable, then the IRB and local
Hi there..
We have a customer we migrated off a Cisco 7600 over to an MX480.
Long story short we're having performance issues and have isolated it down
to some questions ;)
This is a 20GE+2X10GE linecard - customer port is using a copper 10/100/1000
SFP. Port is hard coded to 100/full
Just to be sure, if you want the port to be forced also disable auto-neg
on the combo interface.
Looks like a duplex mismatch at first sight.
Christian
Le 21/10/2010 18:26, Paul Stewart a écrit :
Hi there..
We have a customer we migrated off a Cisco 7600 over to an MX480.
Long story
- Forwarded Message
From: Derick Winkworth dwinkwo...@att.net
To: Daniel Hilj daniel.h...@ipnett.se
Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 1:24:12 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VPLS issue...
I need the local interface to remain up too.
From: Daniel Hilj
See cluepon:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Replacing_the_harddisk_with_solid_state_flash
Am Mittwoch, den 20.10.2010, 17:19 -0400 schrieb Fernando Atilano:
Anybody that can provide as to how to replace a m10 hard disk? one of them
failed.
any feedback is greatly appreciated.
Thank you Jonas !!
Fernando Atilano| Transtelco| Networking Support
MX 52.656.257.1114
US1.915.217.2286
On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
j...@probe-networks.de
wrote:
See cluepon:
What are the commands you need to use to upgrade the hard disk ?
Somethin like:
request system snapshot media ... ?
Anyone knows how to do that ?
Thanks a lot,
Thank you Jonas !!
Fernando Atilano| Transtelco| Networking Support
MX 52.656.257.1114
US1.915.217.2286
On Oct 21, 2010, at
Quick question about policing.
Basically I'd like to know if this config will work. I'm pretty sure it
will and the Juniper docs seems to agree with me, but the collective
wisdom of JNSP would be appreciated.
Router in question is a Juniper J2350.
Basically I want to say:
192.168.0.0/24 is in
See:
http://www.mail-archive.com/juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg06658.html
request system partition hard-disk
request system snapshot partition
request system snapshot
Am Donnerstag, den 21.10.2010, 20:16 -0200 schrieb Giuliano Cardozo
Medalha:
What are the commands you need to use to
I did a similar exercise a while ago on T-series and it works, I would
expect it to work the same way on J-series.
Some tips:
1/ if you want to limit two or more customers to, say, 10Mbps each, don't
configure a filter-specific policer, configure a regular 10Mbps policer.
By default, a regular
People,
Does anyone uses SRX routers for MPLS (VPLS) Transport ?
We are thinking about the use of SRX220 under some conditions:
- Use it in a not a good environment without air conditioning and a lot
of dust ... external box temperature rises from 35 to 42 Celsius.
- Be the point to
People,
Does anyone uses SRX routers for MPLS (VPLS) Transport ?
We are thinking about the use of SRX220 under some conditions:
- Use it in a not a good environment without air conditioning and a lot
of dust ... external box temperature rises from 35 to 42 Celsius.
- Be the point to
Hi Giuliano,
We do not support MPLS on SRX platforms.
Thanks Regards,
Jai
- Original Message -
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thu Oct 21 19:48:46 2010
Subject: [j-nsp]
I don't believe that's the case. You can do MPLS (I can't say I've ever done
it, but I know the config is possible) the major catch with that is the SRX
will be switched to packet mode (vs flow) and you loose the flow
capabilities of the SRX platform. Basically you can turn the SRX into a
branch
Sorry for the confusion. The top end SRX don't yet support the MPLS feature as
yet. The top end SRX don't work in packet mode.
--Original Message--
From: EXT - xmi...@gmail.com
To: Jai Chandra Gundapaneni
Cc: giulian...@uol.com.br
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp]
High-end SRXs (SRX3000s and SRX5000s) do not support packet-based only
processing.
Branch SRX (SRX100s, SRX200s, SRX650s) support either packet-based only,
flow-based only or mixed mode (selective packet services). Please refer to the
following app note for some great examples:
I found three ways to keep the local interface up so it can hit the irb
interface even if all remote PEs for the VPLS instance are lost:
1. Use two physical ports to the PE from the CE, one for VPLS and one for L3.
You could put a switch in front of your PE to accomplish this. I think
17 matches
Mail list logo
