Re: [j-nsp] SRX for MPLS

2010-10-25 Thread Miroslav Georgiev
I tested everything from mpls, ldp, rsvp, l2vpns, l3vpns, vpls and other routing protocols. There are some limitations for mtu, encapsulations, fragmentation and other small but pain in the ass things. Best thing is to get some (2 or more srx210 or better) and to do your tests . After that you

[j-nsp] EX4200: VC incremental upgrade ?

2010-10-25 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
Hi! Silly question: is it possible to perform incremental upgrade on ex-series virtual-chassis ? I.e., upgrade some switches (using 'request system software add member NN'), switchover master to 'upgraded' part, then upgrade remaining switches ? Juniper documentation is not so clear on this

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200: VC incremental upgrade ?

2010-10-25 Thread Philipp Geschke
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:10:46 +0400, Alexandre Snarskii s...@snar.spb.ru wrote: Hi! Silly question: is it possible to perform incremental upgrade on ex-series virtual-chassis ? I.e., upgrade some switches (using 'request system software add member NN'), switchover master to 'upgraded' part,

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200: VC incremental upgrade ?

2010-10-25 Thread Joe Hamelin
From what I've seen you might be able to upgrade a VC member but once it reboots with the new and different image it will no longer be part of the VC. So yeah, you can kinda do it but it's not much help over just pulling the member and doing a stand alone upgrade. The code has to match on a VC.

[j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Richard Zheng
Hi, A juniper reseller came back with a suggestion of J-4350. The price is similar to a used M7i. I was surprised by this option first. Then considering that the application is for a small ISP, it might not be bad. The DRAM may be upgraded to 2G which should hold several whole Internet tables for

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Joe Hamelin
The big difference is that the J series routes everything through the Intel CPU. They do some trick daemon scheduling to get the best packet rate out of them but it's still a software router. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Keegan Holley

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Gabriel Blanchard
On 2010-10-25, at 5:05 PM, Richard Zheng wrote: Hi, A juniper reseller came back with a suggestion of J-4350. The price is similar to a used M7i. I was surprised by this option first. Then considering that the application is for a small ISP, it might not be bad. The DRAM may be upgraded

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Julien Goodwin
On 26/10/10 08:54, Gabriel Blanchard wrote: We in fact use a J-6350 at our office and we couldn't even get it to handle a full routing table. (at least not very well). They handle a full routing table just fine. With the old packet-mode software they could do a full table (as of January) in 1g