Re: [j-nsp] Per VRF MPLs-TE

May be this can help you: https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8645 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadBody/8645-102-1-31472/Lab-%20MPLS%20TE%20with%20Per%20VRF.pdf Regards, Vladimir On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Dwater dwater2...@gmail.com wrote: How can I

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 for PPP customers on ERX310

Hello, Amos. I have some experience with Juniper IPv6oPPPoE on E-series. Can you please show me show configuration of your BRAS ? I have encountered a similar problem. In my case root cause was validLifetime=0 in RA messages. Like this: --- ipv6 nd prefix-advertisement 2001:db8::/64 0 0

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 for PPP customers on ERX310

Hello Egor, Thanks for the reply. Below is my profile configuration. profile L2TP-Users-Profile ip unnumbered loopback 0 ip sa-validate ip tcp adjust-mss 1360 ipv6 virtual-router default ipv6 unnumbered loopback 0 ipv6 nd managed-config-flag ipv6 nd other-config-flag ipv6 nd ra-interval 3

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 for PPP customers on ERX310

Amos, Probably it's enough. Let's consider this option: --- ipv6 nd managed-config-flag --- This option sets Managed address configuration flag in RA messages:

[j-nsp] logical-systems loopback's

I'm starting to get logical-systems going on my M5, and I've hit something odd that I've not seen before, and Google isn't helping. Juniper M5, running 10.0R2.10. When I configure a loopback in a logical-system (eg, lo0.6 for one of them) all seems fine. When I try and use lo0.6 as the source

Re: [j-nsp] logical-systems loopback's

While I'm on the topic of things which aren't quite right, why does commiting an aggregated-sonet or ethernet connection without setting device count (chassis - aggregated-devices) not throw at least a warning that this will silently fail? -- Julien Goodwin Studio442 Blue Sky Solutioneering