Hi,
I'm trying to simplify as much as possible the config I have for a L3 vpn
over mpls between 2 sites but it seems that I now have some issues: I can't
ping interfaces from the other site even though I see the routes so any
help would be greatly appretiated.
*Topology:* (ge0/0/3.110 vpn-a
Hi,
could you please share what is your hardware on the core facing interfaces ?
There are some restrictions when using vrf-table-label.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.4/topics/usage-guidelines/vpns-filtering-packets-in-layer-3-vpns-based-on-ip-headers.html
Thanks
./diogo
Hi Diogo,
All 3 devices part of the mpls domain are J2320 routers that have only Gig
Eth interfaces.
BR,
Vlad
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Diogo Montagner
diogo.montag...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
could you please share what is your hardware on the core facing interfaces
?
There are some
Can you post the config or at least the routing table from the other side?
Are your LSP's up?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Vlad Ion vlad.th...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to simplify as much as possible the config I have for a L3 vpn
over mpls between 2 sites but it seems that I
Chances are his lsp to remote PE is up as he has the following route
his is pinging active in his vrf.
10.10.2.0/24 *[BGP/170] 05:27:25, localpref 100, from 10.2.0.1
AS path: I
to 172.16.150.1 via ge-0/0/1.0, Push 16, Push
299808(top)
If the
Den 11.03.2011 12:45, skrev Vlad Ion:
ping routing-instance vpn-a 10.10.2.254
PING 10.10.2.254 (10.10.2.254): 56 data bytes
^C
--- 10.10.2.254 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Phill Jolliffe
ph...@saddlebacksolutions.com wrote:
Chances are his lsp to remote PE is up as he has the following route
his is pinging active in his vrf.
I suppose but it looks like his configs work and MPLS/L3VPN pretty much does
the rest automatically.
hi Bjørn,
If I ping 10.10.1.254 (local vrrp interface or 10.10.1.253 local physical
interface)... I get 100% success rate.
Br,
Vlad
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Bjørn Tore b...@paulen.net wrote:
Den 11.03.2011 12:45, skrev Vlad Ion:
ping routing-instance vpn-a 10.10.2.254
PING
Hi,
I was thinking pinging the remote if with source address local if.
/bt
- Reply message -
Fra: Vlad Ion vlad.th...@gmail.com
Til: Bjørn Tore b...@paulen.net
Kopi: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Emne: [j-nsp] l3vpn help needed
Dato: fre., mars 11, 2011 19:47
hi Bjørn,
If I ping
Hi Vlad,
Maybe you need to review to this link:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2010-October/018150.html
Here we are taking the topic about the use of vrf-table-label.
Best regards,
David.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:01 PM, b...@paulen.net b...@paulen.net wrote:
Hi,
I was
Den 11.03.2011 19:47, skrev Vlad Ion:
hi Bjørn,
If I ping 10.10.1.254 (local vrrp interface or 10.10.1.253 local
physical interface)... I get 100% success rate.
Br,
Vlad
I was thinking like
ping routing-instance vpn-a 10.10.2.254 source-address 10.10.1.253
if you have
11 matches
Mail list logo
