[j-nsp] MX-series Redundant RE - Unable to mask fxp0 down alarm

2011-05-01 Thread Chris Kawchuk
Forgive me if this is a known bugI seem unable to mask the fxp0 management port down alarm for the Redundant RE - host 1. (works fine for the primary RE - host 0). Platform: MX480, JunOS 10.3R3.7 groups { re0 { chassis { alarm { management-ethernet {

Re: [j-nsp] MX-series Redundant RE - Unable to mask fxp0 down alarm

2011-05-01 Thread Chris Kawchuk
Hi Paul..! Yeah - I tried that as well initially with no luck (and just tried again just now...) me@wowter show configuration chassis alarm { management-ethernet { link-down ignore; } } user@wowter show chassis alarms 1 alarms currently active Alarm time Class

Re: [j-nsp] MX-series Redundant RE - Unable to mask fxp0 down alarm

2011-05-01 Thread OBrien, Will
Silly question... You did use commit sync, correct? Will O'Brien On May 1, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Chris Kawchuk juniperd...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul..! Yeah - I tried that as well initially with no luck (and just tried again just now...) me@wowter show configuration chassis alarm {

Re: [j-nsp] MX-series Redundant RE - Unable to mask fxp0 down alarm

2011-05-01 Thread Chris Kawchuk
Heh. Good question! I just had to double check: show config system commit synchronize; Thats in there.. OK let's try it manually. ckawchuk@jmx480# commit synchronize and-quit re0: configuration check succeeds re1: commit complete re0: commit complete Exiting configuration

Re: [j-nsp] EX Series | 10.4R3.4 Limited Received Routes

2011-05-01 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:48:59AM -0700, Bill Blackford wrote: So if what you are saying is that the EX, only being capable of 16k routes, will only Receive and Accept a random smattering of a full table being sent up to 16k and any filters beyond that filter on the 16k Received and

Re: [j-nsp] EX Series | 10.4R3.4 Limited Received Routes

2011-05-01 Thread Bill Blackford
Thanks Richard. Great comments on and off list. Thank you. This just happened to be the first time I tested this scenario. I had a fundamental misunderstanding of the behavior of the RIB/FIB on the EX. In production, my EX's only get IGP and local AS. As a side note, when I filter by upto /19