Re: [j-nsp] BGP multihop problem - ERX310

try turning on BGP debugging on the ERX. It's likely a timer expiry like you pointed out but at least that way you'll be able to tell where the problem lies. -Gabe On 2011-05-02, at 7:19 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: > Hi there. > > > > Turning up an ERX-310 for a customer - it's multihomed to 2 d

[j-nsp] BGP multihop problem - ERX310

Hi there. Turning up an ERX-310 for a customer - it's multihomed to 2 different ISP's. First ISP connection works great and has been stable for about a month now (since it was turned up). The second connection has two sessions - the first session is a /30 and is stable. only one prefix

Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 junos 10.3 nat missbehavior?

Hi Correa, You stated your issue was that you have traffic arriving at the ge-0/0/0 interface (Untrust) but you do not see it being forwarded towards the ge-0/0/3 interface (Trust). Everything is perfect with your configuration, except that you don’t have a NAT policy to translate traffic origina

Re: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome....

Hi, By removing the communities and replacing them with tags, would still not Put all the configuration in one place. I will not do any tags or communities on the static routes, but instead move it all to policy-statements. Thanks for confirming that communities set in one policy can indeed be

Re: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome....

> -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net] > Sendt: 30. april 2011 17:48 > Til: Peter Krupl; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Emne: RE: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome > > > -Original Message- > > From: juniper-nsp-boun..