your juniper reseller needs some training it sounds like. the M series platform
has forwarded ipv6 in hardware at least as far back as the 20th century.
On Jun 2, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Our Juniper sales rep (3rd party reseller, not Juniper direct) is telling us
that IPv6
On Jun 4, 2011, at 4:46 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
your juniper reseller needs some training it sounds like. the M series
platform has forwarded ipv6 in hardware at least as far back as the 20th
century.
The orginal m40 had a 1/2 duplex ethernet between the re and the pfe, clearly
in no
10.4R4 seems usable on MX960 with mixed DPC/MPC. There is a packet
discard bug on MX80 though - it randomly mistakes non-first fragments
as L2TP packets and as no L2TP service is configured, discards those
packets.
Would you happen to have the PR for this?
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:57:43PM -0400, Keegan Holley wrote:
10.4R4 seems usable on MX960 with mixed DPC/MPC. There is a packet
discard bug on MX80 though - it randomly mistakes non-first fragments
as L2TP packets and as no L2TP service is configured, discards those
packets.
Would you
I've had 10.4r4 in my lab MX960 for a couple of weeks now with no real issues,
but not much test traffic either.
I'm planning to deploy it later this summer to prep for MS-DPC's that are on
the way.
I do have an odd case of a nat service breaking a filter based policer, but on
for Nat'd
5 matches
Mail list logo
