Re: [j-nsp] How does multihop eBGP work?

2011-06-26 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Aaron Dewell wrote: Sure. Everything is actually routed hop-by-hop. As you've observed, that's a serious obstacle to multihop eBGP. Most uses I've seen involve crossing a non-BGP router to a customer, and redistributing whatever the customer advertises

Re: [j-nsp] How does multihop eBGP work?

2011-06-26 Thread Keegan Holley
Can you elaborate? This isn't really much info to go on. multi-hop BGP is pretty simple though. In fact it's pretty much identical to the way most configure iBGP (sans mpls). You peer based on an address that is not directly connected to you. Once that is established you start receiving

Re: [j-nsp] What do you think about the MX line?

2011-06-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, June 27, 2011 06:56:48 AM Keegan Holley wrote: I think the general attitude is positive towards them. They are a good compliment to the M/T series and generally solid flexible boxes. You should probably include how you plan to use them in your question. For example a few list

Re: [j-nsp] What do you think about the MX line?

2011-06-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, June 27, 2011 06:56:48 AM Keegan Holley wrote: I think the general attitude is positive towards them. They are a good compliment to the M/T series and generally solid flexible boxes. You should probably include how you plan to use them in your question. For example a few list

Re: [j-nsp] What do you think about the MX line?

2011-06-26 Thread Ryan Finnesey
For us I will be looking at the MX Line mainly for peering. Anyone having issues with using them with peering? Cheers Ryan -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 9:19

Re: [j-nsp] What do you think about the MX line?

2011-06-26 Thread Ryan Finnesey
We are looking at the MX80s for about 60GB of traffic with also some private MLPS interconnection. Cheers Ryan -Original Message- From: Timothy Kaufman [mailto:tkauf...@corp.nac.net] Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:49 PM To: Ryan Finnesey; 'mti...@globaltransit.net';

Re: [j-nsp] What do you think about the MX line?

2011-06-26 Thread Timothy Kaufman
Which one are you looking at? How many peers do you plan to configure? How much traffic? Thanks Tim Kaufman Sent via blackberry - Original Message - From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net To: mti...@globaltransit.net mti...@globaltransit.net;

Re: [j-nsp] What do you think about the MX line?

2011-06-26 Thread Mehmet Akcin
you probably want MX240-480-960s rather. mehmet On Jun 26, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote: We are looking at the MX80s for about 60GB of traffic with also some private MLPS interconnection. Cheers Ryan -Original Message- From: Timothy Kaufman