On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Aaron Dewell wrote:
Sure. Everything is actually routed hop-by-hop. As you've observed, that's
a serious obstacle to multihop eBGP.
Most uses I've seen involve crossing a non-BGP router to a customer, and
redistributing whatever the customer advertises
Can you elaborate? This isn't really much info to go on. multi-hop BGP is
pretty simple though. In fact it's pretty much identical to the way most
configure iBGP (sans mpls). You peer based on an address that is not
directly connected to you. Once that is established you start receiving
On Monday, June 27, 2011 06:56:48 AM Keegan Holley wrote:
I think the general attitude is positive towards them.
They are a good compliment to the M/T series and
generally solid flexible boxes. You should probably
include how you plan to use them in your question. For
example a few list
On Monday, June 27, 2011 06:56:48 AM Keegan Holley wrote:
I think the general attitude is positive towards them.
They are a good compliment to the M/T series and
generally solid flexible boxes. You should probably
include how you plan to use them in your question. For
example a few list
For us I will be looking at the MX Line mainly for peering. Anyone
having issues with using them with peering?
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 9:19
We are looking at the MX80s for about 60GB of traffic with also some private
MLPS interconnection.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Kaufman [mailto:tkauf...@corp.nac.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:49 PM
To: Ryan Finnesey; 'mti...@globaltransit.net';
Which one are you looking at?
How many peers do you plan to configure?
How much traffic?
Thanks
Tim Kaufman
Sent via blackberry
- Original Message -
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
To: mti...@globaltransit.net mti...@globaltransit.net;
you probably want MX240-480-960s rather.
mehmet
On Jun 26, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
We are looking at the MX80s for about 60GB of traffic with also some private
MLPS interconnection.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Kaufman
8 matches
Mail list logo