[j-nsp] Route Precedence

2011-07-13 Thread Chris
Hi all, I have a pair of EX4200's which are running iBGP to a pair of J6350's. I am seeing some strange behaviour with the routing on them. The EX4200's have a few different VLANs setup: vlan 50 - Used to connect to a J6350 vlan 100 - The VLAN the devices I am trying to reach are on The

Re: [j-nsp] Route Precedence

2011-07-13 Thread Chris
On 13/07/2011 2:27 PM, Chris wrote: snip To add to the already long email, here is some more examples of whats happening: From the 10.10.10.100 device, trying to ping the 'acc-bdr1' (J6350) device works: traceroute to 99.99.99.242 (99.99.99.242), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 10.10.10.254

Re: [j-nsp] Route Precedence

2011-07-13 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Chris li...@blackhat.bz wrote: On 13/07/2011 2:27 PM, Chris wrote: snip To add to the already long email, here is some more examples of whats happening: From the 10.10.10.100 device, trying to ping the 'acc-bdr1' (J6350) device works: traceroute to

Re: [j-nsp] Route Precedence

2011-07-13 Thread Ben Dale
Hi Chris, At a guess, It looks like you're trying to dump 170,000 routes from your Border: inet.0: 363930 destinations, 363932 routes (170427 active, 0 holddown, 193504 hidden) into your core EX4200: inet.0: 16384 destinations, 16384 routes (16384 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) which is

Re: [j-nsp] Route Precedence

2011-07-13 Thread Chris
On 13/07/2011 3:29 PM, Ben Dale wrote: Hi Chris, Hi all, Thanks for the replies - the issue is as above, the routing table was topping out. I should have checked that - it completely slipped my mind. Thanks again all! ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Route Precedence

2011-07-13 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Chris li...@blackhat.bz wrote: On 13/07/2011 3:29 PM, Ben Dale wrote: Hi Chris, Hi all, Thanks for the replies - the issue is as above, the routing table was topping out. I should have checked that - it completely slipped my mind. Nice catch, Ben! The EXes

Re: [j-nsp] Route Precedence

2011-07-13 Thread Shane Short
Hi Chris, Just a hunch but I suspect the FIB on your EX4200 is full (I seem to recall the EX can only hold 16K routes), which is probably causing all kinds of weirdness: inet.0: 16384 destinations, 16384 routes (16384 active, 0 holddown, 0 You probably want to filter your routes down to what

[j-nsp] Back-reference in JunOS regular expressions

2011-07-13 Thread Michael Hallgren
Hi, Is back-reference, like (.)( \1)*$, provided by the JunOS AS-path matching engine? (This should match, for instance, ^6453$, ^6453_6453$, ^6453_6453_6453$, and so on...) I can't find a firm statement in the JunOS documentation, and some tests makes me believe it's not implemented. Or am I

[j-nsp] m10i RE-5.0 Memory Upgrade

2011-07-13 Thread Mario Andres Rueda Jaimes
Hi All We are looking for some way to Upgrade the Memory of the RE-5.0 (512Mb Memory Base) on M10i Router. Anybody has perform this before ? is this possible ? Thanks !! ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Back-reference in JunOS regular expressions

2011-07-13 Thread Alexander Frolkin
Hi, Is back-reference, like (.)( \1)*$, provided by the JunOS AS-path matching engine? (This should match, for instance, ^6453$, ^6453_6453$, ^6453_6453_6453$, and so on...) Never tried this, but do you mean something like ([0-9]*)( \1)* ? This works with egrep: $ echo 123 123 | egrep

[j-nsp] ASRe: Back-reference in JunOS regular expressions

2011-07-13 Thread Michael Hallgren
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2011 à 15:15 +0100, Alexander Frolkin a écrit : Hi, Is back-reference, like (.)( \1)*$, provided by the JunOS AS-path matching engine? (This should match, for instance, ^6453$, ^6453_6453$, ^6453_6453_6453$, and so on...) Never tried this, but do you mean

Re: [j-nsp] Back-reference in JunOS regular expressions

2011-07-13 Thread Daniel Verlouw
Hi, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 15:18, Michael Hallgren m.hallg...@free.fr wrote: I can't find a firm statement in the JunOS documentation, and some tests makes me believe it's not implemented. Or am I mistaken with the syntax? (I can use back-reference in 'replace', etc, etc...) see

Re: [j-nsp] m10i RE-5.0 Memory Upgrade

2011-07-13 Thread Andrew Hoyos
On Jul 13, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Mario Andres Rueda Jaimes wrote: We are looking for some way to Upgrade the Memory of the RE-5.0 (512Mb Memory Base) on M10i Router. Anybody has perform this before ? is this possible ? Sure is, there are three DIMM slots on your RE-5.0. Assuming you probably

[j-nsp] Making an SRX a Router and Security Device, for an enterprise

2011-07-13 Thread Mike Williams
Hi all, Two of us here have almost lost our minds trying to do this. So we're hoping for a suitably strong fu-injection. We have an MX80 and an SRX650, and shortly we'll have another MX and SRX, with further to come. Elsewhere we've got a mixture of SRX, J-series (some Js all packet-mode, some

[j-nsp] Únete a mi red en LinkedIn

2011-07-13 Thread Nam Nguyen a través de LinkedIn
LinkedIn Nam Nguyen ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: -- Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn. Aceptar invitación de Nam Nguyen

Re: [j-nsp] m10i RE-5.0 Memory Upgrade

2011-07-13 Thread MSusiva
Hi, The RE 400 (CLI name RE.5) can be upgraded. It does supports upto 786B of SDRAM. Please check the following link: Page#4 and table:32. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/nog/nog-hardware/download/routing-engines.pdf -- Thanks, Siva ___