ECMP doesn't work as of today in branch series SRX's if advanced
security features are enabled such as NAT, IDP, ALG's, and such. The
problem is with the flow module and where routing decisions take
place.
It will work if the both destination interfaces are in the same zone
and you're using basic
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the reply.This document does really helps to understand what
auto-export means.
I also understood what is the difference between auto-export and RIB groups
in leaking the routes b/w VRF on the same PE. But I have one question,
Using RIB groups will consume more cpu/memory
Is that device running any kind of firewall? Seems likely if you can ping
from it.
On 26 August 2011 16:26, Pappas, AJ apap...@ottawaregional.org wrote:
I am have a ex4200 that is configured for a particular vlan vlan 244.
This vlan is configured on 2 ports. I can reach one device fine, the
On (2011-08-25 17:11 +0100), Brendan Regan wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knew how to calculate how many routes can be taken
in on an MX80 with 2 Full EBGP peers and 1 IBGP peer?
I've not tested more than million routes myself (and 1000 BGP sessions). But it
should scale to 2M routes at
On 27/08/11 22:13, Saku Ytti wrote:
Hardwarewise scaling is same as any MPC in larger MX, but control-plane is lot
less beefy than big brothers. Not really sure why, it's not like intel CPU
would be significant BOM addition to MX80 compared to freescale.
tinfoilhatdownscaling trio would have
On (2011-08-27 22:48 +1000), Julien Goodwin wrote:
less beefy than big brothers. Not really sure why, it's not like intel CPU
would be significant BOM addition to MX80 compared to freescale.
tinfoilhatdownscaling trio would have been expensive, lot cheaper to
reduce
the scale of the
where are you pinging from? inside the vlan or outside of it? Check for
mac-addresses. If you are learning the devices mac addresses on both ports
in the correct vlans it's not the switch or the config. Have you tried
another device in the same port or swapping the two devices? Can you post
If that's true then that's horrible news. The data sheet for the sex branch
series lines says that it can do ECMP, but says nothing about mixing it with
advanced services. This seems so trivial. Going to spend some time in the lab.
Thanks!
On Aug 27, 2011, at 3:02 AM, Tim Eberhard
Best of luck Daniel. Please report back if you find other results but
I spent a fair amount of time in my lab and then working with some of
my internal contacts within Juniper on this issue.
For the record, I hate how the iphone autocorrects SRX into sex.
That's bitten me more than once now. :)
On 8/27/11 05:48 , Julien Goodwin wrote:
On 27/08/11 22:13, Saku Ytti wrote:
Hardwarewise scaling is same as any MPC in larger MX, but control-plane is
lot
less beefy than big brothers. Not really sure why, it's not like intel CPU
would be significant BOM addition to MX80 compared to
2011/8/25 Brendan Regan brendan.bre...@gmail.com
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knew how to calculate how many routes can be
taken
in on an MX80 with 2 Full EBGP peers and 1 IBGP peer?
I dont' think this is something you can calculate. Most vendors do
extensive testing and come up with a
Brendan,
The MX80 can handle about 4,000,000 IPv4 prefixes in the RIB and about
1,000,000 IPv4 prefixes in the FIB.
Thank you,
--
Doug Hanks, JNCIE-ENT, JNCIE-SP #875
Sr. Systems Engineer
Juniper Networks
The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those
of Juniper
Sorry for what seems to be a dumb question.
I see a lot of talk about different juniper chip architecture. What's trio,
etc? What makes it better than other venders? How can I get more info on
juniper internal architectures?
Salud,
j.j.j.
___
*some* useful information can be found here:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/Category:Hardware
Lots of big blank spots and lots of older information, but it's a good
start and about as good as you're going to get (as far as I know of)
without being an internal Juniper employee.
Good luck,
-Tim
Tom,
This is incredibly helpful. Thank you for sharing.
j.j.j.
On Aug 27, 2011 8:44 PM, Tim Eberhard xmi...@gmail.com wrote:
*some* useful information can be found here:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/Category:Hardware
Lots of big blank spots and lots of older information, but it's a good
start
15 matches
Mail list logo
