Re: [j-nsp] HE.net Tunnelbroker and m7i

2011-09-07 Thread Phil Mayers
On 09/06/2011 10:48 PM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: Seems that the tunnel doesn't seem to going up. Do I have missed something ? Does the integrated Tunnel PIC on M7i can cope with that ? The M7i integrated pic can definitely to IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnels. We ran with one for several years. Can

Re: [j-nsp] HE.net Tunnelbroker and m7i

2011-09-07 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 04:25:14 PM Phil Mayers wrote: Can you be a bit more specific about symptoms? What does show int extensive say? Anything in the logs? Stupid question, but... do you have symmetric reachability to/from the tunnel destination address? Cheers, Mark.

Re: [j-nsp] Multihome SRX650 2 default routes

2011-09-07 Thread Chen Jiang
you can use routing-instance to achieve ECMP/NAT in SRX. On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Daniel Daloia daniel.dal...@yahoo.comwrote: If that's true then that's horrible news. The data sheet for the sex branch series lines says that it can do ECMP, but says nothing about mixing it with

Re: [j-nsp] LSP Refresh ISIS

2011-09-07 Thread david.roy
Thks. That could be the reason... David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com Skype : davidroy.35 JNCIE-M/T #703(SP #1168) -Message d'origine- De : Vladimir Blazhkun

Re: [j-nsp] Multihome SRX650 2 default routes

2011-09-07 Thread Tim Eberhard
Yes, my apologies if I wasn't clear in my original email. The hack involved to get ECMP and any real security functionality working with the SRX involves multiple virtual routers. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Chen Jiang iloveb...@gmail.com wrote: you can use routing-instance to achieve