Dear Chris
Thanks a lot for your clear and professional support.
Best Regards,
Mohamed Edrees
-Original Message-
From: Chris Kawchuk [mailto:juniperd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 6:46 PM
To: medrees
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RSVP reserve
Ups. First accidentally unicasted this to RAS yesterday night. Sorry,
Richard.
Yep. Also discovered this just today, trying to download Junos to a remote
machine with links (another text-based browser :).
Was really surprised seeing the 180 megs tgz opened as text. But I was
surprised even more
Very true. many a pages that I've gone to that I wind up with a
Javascript:void(0) instead of an actual linkable object.
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Jared Mauch wrote:
Actually the problem is that many people don't think you might download with
http from a non-browser, etc
This means you end up
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:00:08PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Actually the problem is that many people don't think you might download with
> http from a non-browser, etc
>
> This means you end up with links that require JavaScript to navigate to them.
> If you can't download the software wi
Actually the problem is that many people don't think you might download with
http from a non-browser, etc
This means you end up with links that require JavaScript to navigate to them.
If you can't download the software with links or lynx then there is a problem.
I would take the ability to
Hi Experts
We had multiple OC3 links attached to a M320, we are trying to perform load
balance of MPLS, L2VPN, L3VPN and IP, but the load balance of MPLS Traffic does
not work, because always takes one link for traffic distribuition.
Anybody has performed this kind of load balance.
There i
Funny that you say that.. IE is the one browser I don't test against, because
it's always been the least compliant/least secure of the browsers.
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:52:45PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Dear Juniper,
You guys bro
I've found most vendors don't think about the actual effort involved in
remotely managing or staging devices.
Jared Mauch
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:41 PM, "Paul Stewart" wrote:
> Yup... thought it was just me... I use Lynx all the time to download from
> Juniper (or at least try to) ;(
>
> Paul
Yup... thought it was just me... I use Lynx all the time to download from
Juniper (or at least try to) ;(
Paul
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Richard A
Steenbergen
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 3:2
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:52:45PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> Dear Juniper,
>
> You guys broke your mime types again, at least for all the 10.4S6.6
> service release URLs. :)
Sigh... I know nobody wants to bother trying to be standards compliant
or testing things on any platform othe
> Please clarify more this statement (have 5% of the available
> bandwidth/buffer space) as I understood if the interface is completely
> utilized using LSP traffic the buffer will be utilized and may starving the
> control traffic (please correct me)
You need to understand the difference between
Hi,
Is it possible to have a filter list that have FQDNs in it and not convert
it to an IP address at time of commit? We would like to do filter lists with
dynamic DNS host names in it.
This is for junos 9.4
Thanks!
Joe
___
juniper-nsp ma
Dear Chris
Thanks a lot for your reply, in cisco they by default allow 75% from
the configured bandwidth value under the interface, and it can be changed to
100% also it can support oversubscription by increasing the bandwidth value
under interface to value larger than the actual interface b
1. RSVP reservations are just that - reservations. They don't actually
police/shape/take away available bandwidth on the interface for other traffic.
LSPs ask for bandwidth reservations so that further/additional LSPs don't
attempt to book their bandwidth on this interface if it's full. (See RS
Dear all !
I have deployed Layer 2 VPN for a customer with 02 sites with different vlan-id
as topo below:
site-1 - (metro) MX80 ---(metro)--- site-2
(outer 100, inner 100) (outer 200, inner 200)
I tested using bridge domain on MX:
Config on MX:
lab@mxA-1# show
15 matches
Mail list logo