Re: [j-nsp] TCAM full on EX8200?

> might not be enough business to justify it anyways), label switching is > so easy from a hardware perspective that it's not even funny. Everyone > and their mother is busy churning out Broadcom Trident+ based 64x10G 1U > boxes right now (see: Juniper QFX, etc), and at a price of a couple > hundre

Re: [j-nsp] Ethernet OAM question?

On 18 October 2011 22:46, tim tiriche wrote: > Can i run link fault management between R1-R2 or is LFM only between > R1 - switchA? The latter, as LFM PDUs shouldn't be forwarded by switches. It should be link-local. > What keepalives method i can use to detect a failure somewhere in the > pr

[j-nsp] Ethernet OAM question?

Hello, I am trying to connect a Point-to-Point Ethernet Circuit via multiple ethernet segments. R1 - switchA - switchB - switchC - switchD - switchE - R2 (switches are multiple providers) Can i run link fault management between R1-R2 or is LFM only between R1 - switchA? What keepalives method i

Re: [j-nsp] CoS value of return traffic

Hi there, We are experiencing an issue caused by exactly this behaviour (Control traffic from the RE being automatically marked as CoS 6), and I think the current answer regarding changing the value is no. We are currently getting around it by looping traffic back into the MX80 (using physical

Re: [j-nsp] l2vpn problem

encapsulation flexible-ethernet services under IFD and encapsulation vlan-ccc under IFL(logical unit)? Krasimir Avramski JNCIE #1051 On 18 Oct 2011 22:32, "Paul Stewart" wrote: > We are starting to work on migrating many layer2 LAN connections over to > our > MPLS environment. I did a lab on l

Re: [j-nsp] l2vpn problem

Hi Paul, Try to add 'remote-site-id ' site dis1.millbrook1 { site-identifier 1; interface ge-1/3/5.512 { remote-site-id 2; } } Hope this helps! Ivan, On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 22:24, Paul S

[j-nsp] l2vpn problem

We are starting to work on migrating many layer2 LAN connections over to our MPLS environment. I did a lab on l2vpn and it worked fine - trying it now as a test on a production network and it's not working ;) A pair of MX80's directly connected to one another - each MX80 has a trunked Etherne

[j-nsp] CoS value of return traffic

Hello, Is there a possibility to set the CoS (802.1p) value of return traffic from RE ? I know that You can do it for, at least , DSCP using: set class-of-service host-outbound traffic Each time I send UDP echo probes to MX80 with different CoS values , the router responds with the same patte

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper E Series, VRF assignment from RADIUS

Hi Callum, Thanks for the mail The aaa domain-map would work if I had a realm for each VRF. Using ' Unisphere-Virtual-Router' with a : and the vrf allows me to create a VRF inside a virtual router. Many thanks! Regards Liam -Original Message- From: Callum Barr [mailto:cb...@wxc.

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper E Series, VRF assignment from RADIUS

Hi Bjørn, I am using Radiator Using ' Unisphere-Virtual-Router' with a : and the vrf allows me to create a VRF inside the virtual router. Many thanks! Regards Liam -Original Message- From: Bjørn Mork [mailto:bj...@mork.no] Sent: 17 October 2011 15:40 To: Liam Murphy Cc: juniper-n