On 16/03/10 06:15, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
...
Mar 1 02:22:28.128 re1.router rpd[1281]: %DAEMON-4: bgp_pp_recv:
peer x.x.x.x (Internal AS ) sent unexpected extra data, probably insane
...
Saw this today, combined idea with a coworker was to open a JTAC case
with the subject Insane in
Dear List, and Juniper lurkers!
The EX4200s we have been purchasing lately are coming with Junos
11.2R1.2 installed from the factory. That version is totally
unusable. Various processes crash at the most trivial operations,
commits, and the CLI even crashes when editing the config (before
How does that kind of code even pass QA to start? I really don't understand.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jeff Wheeler j...@inconcepts.biz wrote:
Dear List, and Juniper lurkers!
The EX4200s we have been purchasing lately are coming with Junos
11.2R1.2 installed from the factory. That
On Dec 14, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
Dear List, and Juniper lurkers!
The EX4200s we have been purchasing lately are coming with Junos
11.2R1.2 installed from the factory. That version is totally
unusable.
snip
Surprising that they don't install the JTAC recommended releases
On 12/14/2011 04:56 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
How does that kind of code even pass QA to start? I really don't understand.
to be clear here... you are talking about the EX series devices, you'd
have to start that part of the conversation about 200 steps back in the
process at: how did this
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:45:26PM -0500, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
Dear List, and Juniper lurkers!
The EX4200s we have been purchasing lately are coming with Junos
11.2R1.2 installed from the factory. That version is totally
Are these the old EX4200-48P, or the new PoE+ EX4200-48PX models? The
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
Are these the old EX4200-48P, or the new PoE+ EX4200-48PX models? The
new models require 11.2 (but they should have loaded a later R).
This is the vanilla EX4200-48T. I can't imagine why it is shipping
with 11.2R1.2. I just
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 05:05:20PM +0100, Nicolaj Kamensek wrote:
Hello list,
can anyone name the major differences between those modules? DPC are
becoming available in the used market for small money and I am wondering
if a DPC non-E is good enough for a classical access router
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:19:54PM -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
Yea but it should have enough silicon to do simple policing in
hardware unless you have every single other feature on the box
enabled. If a policer with no queueing, and no marking etc, caused
throughput to decrease by 20%
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:48:22AM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
Can anyone shed some light on these log messages?
Nov 30 04:48:21 core2.toronto1 rpd[1359]: bgp_send: sending 19 bytes to
xx.xxx.52.50 (External AS x) blocked (no spooling requested): Resource
temporarily unavailable
grep
I
2011/12/14 Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:19:54PM -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
Yea but it should have enough silicon to do simple policing in
hardware unless you have every single other feature on the box
enabled. If a policer with no queueing, and no
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 05:45:26 AM Jeff Wheeler
wrote:
Perhaps putting a Junos on the switches that is remotely
stable when shipping them out from the factory would be
a good idea.
I suppose stable is in the eye of the beholder :-).
Given regression testing seems to be going down
12 matches
Mail list logo
