Hi,
Same results on my side...
Just a precision to be sure that there is no mis-understanding : it's not
triggered by SCB-E, it is a software issue... But currently we only have this
release to play with SCB-E :-)
Regards
David
David Roy
IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France
Ph. +33
Hello,
I have been trying to get a RAD Data Communications Mirici-155 SFP to
work in an MX-series box.
The Mirici-155 is an SFP-compatible OC-3 plug-able optic that looks
and feels like an Ethernet SFP to the switch or router, except it
takes Ethernet frames and encapsulates them in GFP for
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:44:10AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
So as far as things stand, SCB-E not deployable before mid 2012
earliest if (and that's a big if when looking at 10.4 experience)
11.4R3 is going to be usable.
Given the state of the code and the lack of faith/experience in
I can test that probably in a few days.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jerry Jones jjo...@danrj.com wrote:
I would be inerested if anyone has used these in an SRX also.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
I would be inerested if anyone has used these in an SRX also.
On Feb 8, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Dave hartzell wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to get a RAD Data Communications Mirici-155 SFP to
work in an MX-series box.
The Mirici-155 is an SFP-compatible OC-3 plug-able optic that looks
and feels
Ido,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this…
I think I understand what you're trying to accomplish, but just a couple more
questions…
I'm assuming this traffic has a source IP in vrf A and a destination IP in
inet.0, and that's why you're using FBF to detour the traffic through the
Hi,
My situation is IPv6 on SRX platform in flow mode.
Documentation on Selective Stateless Packet-Based Services suggests
support for both IPv4 and IPv6 routing but the packet-mode option is not
available under family inet6.
Is it actually possible to explicitly match an ipv6 traffic flow
7 matches
Mail list logo
