On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> Hi everyone...
>
> I have a troubling problem. We run a couple EX8208's, and have a mix of
> 1200, 2000 and 3000w PSU's in use. So far within the past ~60 days, we have
> had 2 out of a total of 12 PSU's running have a failure. Unfortunatel
Hi everyone...
I have a troubling problem. We run a couple EX8208's, and have a mix of
1200, 2000 and 3000w PSU's in use. So far within the past ~60 days, we have
had 2 out of a total of 12 PSU's running have a failure. Unfortunately,
thats not the problem.
The problem is, when these PSUs die, th
Thanks! I just heard from another one of our engineers who is much
more familiar with Juniper than I am. He already knew about this, so I
was just a little slow on the uptake. lol
Thanks to all for the help.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Harry Reynolds wrote:
> Yes, I believe that is enough
Yes, I believe that is enough to cause your issue.
I believe that independent domain might help with the global as loop check, but
it too is global and needs to be carefully tested.
Else use as loops, which should also be tested. ;) Adding will flap bgp IIRC.
Regards
-Original Messa
We do have the following configured under bgp:
group SomeGroupName {
type external;
traceoptions {
file ipv4-ebgp-customer-logs size 10m files 10;
flag state;
}
description "SomeGroup";
family inet {
unicast;
}
remove-private;
local-as X
Oh, I think there are, actually. Let me check. I know when I was
looking for a local AS config, I know I saw one with AS X
configured.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Harry Reynolds wrote:
> Are there any vrfs on this box using AS ?
>
> In JUNOS AS loop check is global, so also applies t
And also you can try " show | match X " to check if X is configured
anywhere else on your router.
M. Salbad
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Try " show bgp neighbor" to check your local AS and peer AS;
Mohammad Salbad
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Remember about 2x things/2x boxes: prot bgp group <> advertise-peer-as /
routing-options auton-syst <> loop 2
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ext John
Neiberger
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:17 PM
To:
Are there any vrfs on this box using AS ?
In JUNOS AS loop check is global, so also applies to any vrfs and their
configured asns.
HTHs
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Neiberger
Sent: Tues
Okay, there is no local AS configured under protocols bgp, and the AS
configured under routing options is correct.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM, John Neiberger wrote:
> I'll do that right now. I checked the AS under routing-options, but
> didn't check for a local-as. Thanks! I'm very new to Ju
I'll do that right now. I checked the AS under routing-options, but
didn't check for a local-as. Thanks! I'm very new to Juniper, so I'm
still pretty lost.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Mohammad wrote:
> I think you need to check the autonomous-system under the routing-options
> hierarchy; and
I think you need to check the autonomous-system under the routing-options
hierarchy; and the local-as under protocols bgp group hierarchy;
Mohammad Salbad
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listin
Something that makes this a little stranger to me is that in the
output showing the looped AS, the local AS isn't ever listed. The
route is originating in AS Y and passing through AS X on the
way to this router, which is in AS Z. I'm confused about how an AS
path loop could be happening
On 3/13/2012 4:15 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> Yes this is correct and is indeed the default Junos behavior. If you wanted
> to receive a looped BGP update, you can define the amount of loops allowed
> (.i.e. number of times your own AS appears in the AS Path attribute) by
> configuring the 'set r
Yes this is correct and is indeed the default Junos behavior. If you wanted to
receive a looped BGP update, you can define the amount of loops allowed (.i.e.
number of times your own AS appears in the AS Path attribute) by configuring
the 'set routing-options autonomous system loops ' command.
Hi john;
As far as I know when an eBGP router receives a route contains its own AS
in the AS path it consider it as a loop, so for your case the juniper router
is seeing its own AS () in the route's ASPATH received from its eBGP
neighbor (X Y I), so the solution I would suggest is
Grr I was hoping that was not the answer. Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2012, at 2:59 PM, "Tim Jackson" wrote:
> http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB22001&cat=JUNOS&actp=LIST
>
> You'll have to run 11.2R1 or later..
>
> --
> Tim
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB22001&cat=JUNOS&actp=LIST
You'll have to run 11.2R1 or later..
--
Tim
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Pappas, AJ wrote:
> Anyone have any issues or comments or concerns about adding a new
> ex4200px to an existing chassis of ex4200's? I
Hi Matt,
I used to run VPLS multihoming in my network, I used LDP based VPLS between
the MX routers, not BGP based VPLS, that based on our tests LDP based VPLS
convergence time (MAC flush) was much faster than BGP based.
The loop prevention mechanism I used was vstp, that it gives the ability
Anyone have any issues or comments or concerns about adding a new
ex4200px to an existing chassis of ex4200's? I know that to add a new
switch to an existing chassis, you must be on the same code level.
Should I downgrade the new ex4200px and put it to the same level as what
I have now?
AJ Pap
John,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:30:35AM -0600, John Neiberger wrote:
I was troubleshooting a problem last night and it boiled down to a
Juniper router that was not a whole slew of iBGP routes from a
neighboring ASR9K. I'm too new to Junos to decipher the reason for it.
I had to disguise it a bi
I was troubleshooting a problem last night and it boiled down to a
Juniper router that was not a whole slew of iBGP routes from a
neighboring ASR9K. I'm too new to Junos to decipher the reason for it.
I had to disguise it a bit, so I hope it's still readable. What does
this actually mean? Can you t
I will have to try that one again. The only other issue would be if a customer
had 2 links into the same aggregation switch ( which happens with Metro
Ethernet more than not due to geographic location ). I would kill both uplinks
from two different locations even though only one location had a f
And most flexible way since 10.0 - applying output filter to loopback
interface:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-cos/cos-assigning-fc-dscp-to-re-pkts.html#id-fine-grain-RE-9740
Note that filter is applied after traffic was treate
25 matches
Mail list logo
