Hi Juniper NSP,
Would like to know whether Juniper MX series router support other variants
of jflow except IP FIX. Flow collector that i m evaluating does not support
IPFIX v10 (inline-jflow) which MX supports. So just wanted to check what
other variants of jflow that can be supported.
thanks
Hi,
There could be an guide for this:
http://www.google.sk/url?sa=trct=jq=esrc=ssource=webcd=1ved=0CCoQFjAA;
url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.juniper.net%2Fus%2Fen%2Flocal%2Fpdf%2Fimplementation-gu
ides%2F8010002-en.pdfei=ajyFT4aeNcfk4QTu8PXFBwusg=AFQjCNFYjlui3rxm97ebrago
Netflow v5 exports off the RE are supported, just make sure you don't over tax
the RE with the sampling rate.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2012, at 3:32, Arun Kumar narain.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Juniper NSP,
Would like to know whether Juniper MX series router support other variants
of
10.04.2012 20:13, Michael Still wrote:
OP wanted to use the IRB ints as next hop for their respective
networks. This is apparently not supported on the SRX platform in
transparent mode:
Yeah, I mentioned this as well. In my post I just wanted to explain why
these (MX-style L2) commands were
v5 certainly.
Keep in mind that sampling depends on your hardware configuration (MS-DPC, etc)
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:32 AM, Arun Kumar wrote:
Hi Juniper NSP,
Would like to know whether Juniper MX series router support other variants
of jflow except IP FIX. Flow collector that i m evaluating
I got on TAC about the fact that they were recommending 10.4 code for the MX
when it doesn't support the Enhanced SCB at all.
I don't know if it was my case or just enough people giving them a hard time,
but they notified me that they've updated KB21476.
There is now an entry for the MX series
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:05:52PM +, OBrien, Will wrote:
I got on TAC about the fact that they were recommending 10.4 code
for the MX when it doesn't support the Enhanced SCB at all.
I don't know if it was my case or just enough people giving them a
hard time, but they notified me that
On 04/11/2012 12:09 PM, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
PS: to whom it may concern: SNMP counters in 11.4R2 broken even worse
than in 11.4R1. Looks like the same PR/731833,
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-February/022369.html
counting is hard... let's go shopping?? wtf?
v5: either RE-based or Service PIC|MSDPC-based
v8: either RE-based or Service PIC|MSDPC-based
v9: only Service PIC|MSDPC-based.
I repeat: v9 is _only_ Service PIC|MSDPC-based. No chance of v9 flow
sampling/exporting on Routing Engine.
HTH
Rgds
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Arun
Hi all,
I do not encounter SNMP issue anymore since the upgrade in 11.4R2.14. Same test
like in 11.4R1
Strange ?
Best regards
David
De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]
de la part de Alexandre Snarskii
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:19:01PM -0400, Chris Morrow wrote:
counting is hard... let's go shopping?? wtf?
Yeah, it's not like we need to bill customers with these routers or
anything. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC
That's what net flow is for! Wait... doh!
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:19:01PM -0400, Chris Morrow wrote:
counting is hard... let's go shopping?? wtf?
Yeah, it's not like we need to bill customers with these routers or
anything. :)
--
Richard A
Here is some explanation.
Branch SrX Series Services Gateways process packets using flow-based
forwarding by default. For the next several releases, the flow module will
support only IP traffic. When MPLS is configured, there is no way of
knowing if an IP packet entering the services gateway will
Hello ,
I would like to change the mail address to amolmde...@rediffmail.com , Please
confirm how I can change it
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ashish verma
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:27 AM
14 matches
Mail list logo
