[j-nsp] vpls multihome link agg test

hi experts, i am using srx test link aggregation to prevent loops as well as provide added bandwidth between PE and CE in vpls. the agg can't success. config is below. i hope my config is wrong . i have check many times. PE(SRX210)===CE(3750) fe-0/0/5 { vlan-tagging; encapsulation

[j-nsp] dynamic flow control process (High Memory)

Hi All We have an M10i router running 10.2R3.10 (512M RAM) ((uptime two years)) with high memory utilization as follow: show chassis routing-engine à Memory utilization 95 percent show system processes extensive à 1317 root1 960 372M 363M select 39:09 0.00% dfcd

[j-nsp] Aggregate Rate-Limit on GE

Hi I have a GE port on MX series router. This GE port has several vlan-tagged sub-interfaces for various customers. I want to put a single aggregate rate limit on main GE interface and don't want to limit each customer by putting rate-limit on sub-interfaces. Is physical-interface-policer of use

[j-nsp] redistribute iBGP learned routes

Hi! I would like to establish the following: customer --- eBGP --- access router --- iBGP --- core router --- iBGP --- edge router --- eBGP --- transit How would you establish this? I do not want an iBGP connection from access to edge. The only way I see at the moment, is to configure

Re: [j-nsp] redistribute iBGP learned routes

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Matthias Brumm matth...@brumm.net wrote: customer --- eBGP --- access router --- iBGP --- core router --- iBGP --- edge router --- eBGP --- transit How would you establish this? I do not want an iBGP connection from access to edge. The only way I see at the

Re: [j-nsp] redistribute iBGP learned routes

Hi! Thanks for your insight. I would like to clean up our structure a bit, so I will go with route-reflection. Matthias Am 22. April 2012 19:33 schrieb Wayne Tucker wa...@tuckerlabs.com: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Matthias Brumm matth...@brumm.net wrote: customer --- eBGP --- access

Re: [j-nsp] redistribute iBGP learned routes

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Matthias Brumm matth...@brumm.net wrote: Thanks for your insight. I would like to clean up our structure a bit, so I will go with route-reflection. If you are not very knowledgeable about BGP, you should probably avoid doing route-reflection (or confederating)

[j-nsp] About Juniper MX10 router performance

Dear valued member: Wishes all are fine. i need   suggestion from you about Juniper MX10 router performance who already implement this. i want to buy  this router for IP Transit provider where i received  all global routes . it would be nice please put your valued suggestion about this