Re: [j-nsp] SNMP Trap targets

On 6/5/2012 5:28 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:41:57PM -0700, Keith wrote: When you have multiple trap targets setup, does the trap go to all the targets or just the first one in the list? Been hunting around and cant seem to find the answer to this. All targets. SNMP tra

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP Trap targets

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:41:57PM -0700, Keith wrote: > When you have multiple trap targets setup, does the trap go to all the > targets or > just the first one in the list? Been hunting around and cant seem to find the > answer to this. All targets. SNMP traps are one-way (fire & forget) anyway

[j-nsp] SNMP Trap targets

MX480 running 10.4R4.5 When you have multiple trap targets setup, does the trap go to all the targets or just the first one in the list? Been hunting around and cant seem to find the answer to this. Thanks, Keith ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-n

[j-nsp] Juniper M7i :: 1x G/E, 1000 BASE / PIC version

Hi all, I've got two old M7i's, both equipped with the 1x G/E, 1000 BASE FIC. There is one difference though - the version (1.4 & 1.6). xxx@xxx# run show chassis pic fpc-slot 1 pic-slot 3 FPC slot 1, PIC slot 3 information: Type 1x G/E, 1000 BASE ASIC type

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 10.4R8 on MX (PR 701928)

Having 10.4R10 in our release database has confused some of the display logic in prsearch.juniper.net for 10.4 values of Resolved-In. We'll be verifying the fix for that for prsearch and deploying it soon, and I'll update this list when that occurs. Thanks Jim -Original Message- From:

Re: [j-nsp] EX/MX G.8032 with OAM CCM's

Hi Ben, My experience with MX (and other vendors) ERPS is that you will get very good convergence times without enabling OAM at all. Unless you have intermediate non-ERPS capable switches that require the OAM or intermediate xWDM transponders without fault reflection etc then I would recommend te