Re: [j-nsp] FW configuations which are required during failover of one db to other !!

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Harri Makela harri_mak...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi All Application Server connecting successfully to DataBase Server01 (db01). This DB01 now need to mirror to db02 and port 5022 will be used. Requirement : Application Servers which currently access DB01 should be

[j-nsp] Why is this term working?

Forgive my Juniper noobiness once again. We have the following term in a ingress firewall filter for marking: term netmgmt { then { count fec-cs2; loss-priority high; forwarding-class MNGMT; It seems to be working, but I don't know why. If there is no accept,

Re: [j-nsp] Why is this term working?

Action modifiers such as count, loss-priority, and forwarding-class implicitly imply a terminating action of accept. Thank you, -- Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213, JNCIE-SP #875 Solutions Architect ­ EABU Juniper Networks On 7/22/12 10:34 AM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote: Forgive

Re: [j-nsp] Why is this term working?

Thanks! I thought that must be the case, but I was told by two other Juniper engineers that it shouldn't be working because there was no explicit accept. That didn't seem to make sense because the term is clearly working. I wanted to check here to make sure I understood. I appreciate the help!

Re: [j-nsp] Why is this term working?

JFYI.. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.1/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-policy/topic-28284.html The nonterminating action operations carry a default accept action //BR -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] Real-world deployment scenarios for cloud services

We're looking for people that work directly with wireline companies that have a large/medium POP presence and offer network services to end-users such as: * Cloud services * Internet services We're specifically interested in cloud services and the different deployment scenarios to deliver