Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 Virtual chassis ??

* Rachid DHOU > We have two EX4200 switches, mainly used for L2 functionalities. > We want to add two new EX4200 Switches and we want to connect them with the > old switches. > > i have two possibilities : > > * Either, interconnect them and control everything with STP. > * or use Virtual chassi

Re: [j-nsp] About Juniper Control Plan Policy (CoPP)

This should walk you through most of your questions: http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one /fundamentals-series/securing-routing-engine/ Doug On 8/22/12 8:35 PM, "Md. Jahangir Hossain" wrote: >Dear all friend: > >Wishes all are fine. > >I quit new in j

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 Virtual chassis ??

I would also suggest virtual chassis option ... Here is the best practices guide for VC .. http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010018-en.pdf On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Rachid DHOU wrote: > Dear experts, > > We have two EX4200 switches, mainly used for L2 functio

Re: [j-nsp] About Juniper Control Plan Policy (CoPP)

All the Routing engine bound traffic into Juniper is handled through the loopback interface. So if you apply the input direction filter on the loopback interface, it would simulate the exact behavior of the control plane filter of cisco. You dont need to apply "protect routing-engine" filter to phy

[j-nsp] About Juniper Control Plan Policy (CoPP)

Dear all friend: Wishes all are fine. I quit new in juniper OS platform . i need some information about juniper Control Plan Policy (CoPP). i read  the RFC 6192 of  Protect Router Control Plane which is: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6192#appendix-A.2 After reading the RFC 6192 i have a 

[j-nsp] Monitoring for redundancy group status, primary / secondary node failover in SRX cluster

Hi, I've asked JTAC about monitoring redundancy group details or even just which node is primary, which node is secondary etc via SNMP. This is the response I've received: * As of now, the answer provided by the previous engineer still holds as there havent' been any developments on this front.

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 Virtual chassis ??

I'd strongly suggest using virtual chassis (as long as your somewhat current on your Junos version). Virtual Chassis is now a mature technology, and it's much easier to administer than the STP route, (faster, better, stronger) Patrick -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck

[j-nsp] EX4200 Virtual chassis ??

Dear experts, We have two EX4200 switches, mainly used for L2 functionalities. We want to add two new EX4200 Switches and we want to connect them with the old switches. i have two possibilities : * Either, interconnect them and control everything with STP. * or use Virtual chassis. Please advi