Re: [j-nsp] Preventing direct routes from forming OSPF summaries

2012-08-30 Thread Tore Anderson
* Wayne Tucker > 2.) Configure xe-0/0/0 in area 1 of both MXs as a secondary interface. > That will allow them to exchange the LSDB for that area even when the > downlink to the EX is down. There are other reasons that you'd > probably want that, anyhow. Sweet. I had no idea that a single inter

Re: [j-nsp] Load balance on AE MX960

2012-08-30 Thread Abel Alejandro
Nevermind, sorry for the noise I think I found the solution at http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.3/topics/example/layer-2-s ervices-load-balancing-and-link-aggregation-example.html Thanks. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun..

[j-nsp] Load balance on AE MX960

2012-08-30 Thread Abel Alejandro
Hello, I have a pair of MX960 with a simple l2circuit connection. My two PE-PE interfaces are load sharing the traffic almost perfectly. However the CE interfaces, which are aggregated interfaces, are only using one link for egress. +-++-+

Re: [j-nsp] Preventing direct routes from forming OSPF summaries

2012-08-30 Thread Wayne Tucker
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Tore Anderson wrote: > I have a OSPFv3 network that looks something like this (simplified): > > +-++-+ > |MX240|xe-0/0/0 ---(area 0)--- xe-0/0/0|MX240| > +-++-+ > xe-0/1/0

Re: [j-nsp] vpn monitor vs dead peer detection

2012-08-30 Thread Burkhard Ott
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:42:11 + "OBrien, Will" wrote: > We've had issues with vpn monitor tearing down tunnels too often with > 10. code on SRXs. I'm currently trying out dead peer detection at the > ike level. I haven't found a good document that describes what dead > peer detection does - I

[j-nsp] vpn monitor vs dead peer detection

2012-08-30 Thread OBrien, Will
We've had issues with vpn monitor tearing down tunnels too often with 10. code on SRXs. I'm currently trying out dead peer detection at the ike level. I haven't found a good document that describes what dead peer detection does - I know it send R-U-THERE etc, but I don't know what it does when th

[j-nsp] Preventing direct routes from forming OSPF summaries

2012-08-30 Thread Tore Anderson
I have a OSPFv3 network that looks something like this (simplified): +-++-+ |MX240|xe-0/0/0 ---(area 0)--- xe-0/0/0|MX240| +-++-+ xe-0/1/0 xe-0/1/0 |

Re: [j-nsp] Problem with L3VPN

2012-08-30 Thread Mihai Gabriel
vrf-table-label missing? On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Johan Borch wrote: > Hi > > I have a problem with getting traffic to flow between L3VPN VRF's, I can > see LSP's ingress & egress, routes are installed in both VRF's but I can't > get any traffic got pass if I try to ping from on the VRF

[j-nsp] Problem with L3VPN

2012-08-30 Thread Johan Borch
Hi I have a problem with getting traffic to flow between L3VPN VRF's, I can see LSP's ingress & egress, routes are installed in both VRF's but I can't get any traffic got pass if I try to ping from on the VRF to the other. Ideas what this could be? Regards Johan __