Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Broadband Model suggestion?

2012-09-17 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:17:15 AM Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: Disadvantage of both PPPoE and VLAN-per-customer: no effective multicast (unless you run that in a seperate second shared-VLAN). In our consideration, Multicast would have been a separate shared VLAN, as it then allows

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Broadband Model suggestion?

2012-09-17 Thread Giuliano Medalha
On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:17:15 AM Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: Disadvantage of both PPPoE and VLAN-per-customer: no effective multicast (unless you run that in a seperate second shared-VLAN). In our consideration, Multicast would have been a separate shared VLAN, as it then allows you

[j-nsp] DHCP option 82 under forwarding-options helpers bootp configuration

2012-09-17 Thread Martin T
Hi, JUNOS(10.4R9.2 at M10i) supports DHCP relay agent information option configuration under forwarding-options helpers bootp. However, despite the configuration, DHCP messages received by DHCP server do not have option 82 present. For example I made such configuration: root@labM10i show

Re: [j-nsp] Tacacs on Junos

2012-09-17 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi Tom Thanks for the reply I was expecting that adding a user and password on the tacacs server and adding server related parameters on the device will be enough such as on Cisco ? why should I configure a user on the router itself ?! BR, Mohammad On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Tom Storey

Re: [j-nsp] Tacacs on Junos

2012-09-17 Thread Dave Bell
On 17 September 2012 15:04, Mohammad Khalil eng.m...@gmail.com wrote: I was expecting that adding a user and password on the tacacs server and adding server related parameters on the device will be enough such as on Cisco ? why should I configure a user on the router itself ?! The users aren't

Re: [j-nsp] Tacacs on Junos

2012-09-17 Thread Doug Hanks
I totally read this as tacos on Junos and got excited for a moment :( ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP option 82 under forwarding-options helpers bootpconfiguration

2012-09-17 Thread Alex Arseniev
Hello there, forwarding-options helpers bootp is not DHCP relay, it is a different feature although they both use same socket. To insert option 82, you need forwarding-option dhcp-relay feature which requires a license. BOOTP helper and dhcp-relay|dhcp-local-server cannot be configured together

[j-nsp] Security Survey: Please Participate

2012-09-17 Thread Sockrider, Gary
[http://www.swiftpage1.com/CampResource/2T0ZVZBHI4PY5TEG/header.jpg] Arbor Networks would like to invite you to participate in our annual Infrastructure Security Survey - a survey of service providers, enterprises, government agencies, universities and

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP option 82 under forwarding-options helpers bootpconfiguration

2012-09-17 Thread Martin T
Alex, I understand this the same way, but for some reason there are dhcp-option82 configuration options under helpers bootp. Looks like at least on some platform(EX series switches) those configuration options really do behave as DHCP option82 settings under dhcp-relay:

Re: [j-nsp] MX Design

2012-09-17 Thread Frank Sweetser
For what it's worth, we've been harassing pretty much everyone we talk to with a juniper.net email address about SPB. I suspect the biggest limitation is that nowhere in any EX or MX docs is there mention of support for 802.1ah mac-in-mac, which is pretty necessary for SPB. That said, the

Re: [j-nsp] MX Design

2012-09-17 Thread Ben Dale
On 18/09/2012, at 11:56 AM, Frank Sweetser f...@wpi.edu wrote: For what it's worth, we've been harassing pretty much everyone we talk to with a juniper.net email address about SPB. I suspect the biggest limitation is that nowhere in any EX or MX docs is there mention of support for