[j-nsp] MX80 port-mirror on MPLS interface

2012-10-02 Thread Leigh Porter
Hey All, Does anybody know if the MX80 supports mirroring of MPLS family traffic? Ethernet, IP, CCC, VPLS etc all seems supported, but when I specify family in any filter of forwarding-options for port-mirroring there is no family mpls available. None of the documents seem to talk about

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 port-mirror on MPLS interface

2012-10-02 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-10-02 11:13 +), Leigh Porter wrote: Hi, Does anybody know if the MX80 supports mirroring of MPLS family traffic? I don't, let me know if you manage to do it. You might be able to export IP inside MPLS by circulating via LT, but I don't think you'll be able to export MPLS frames

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 port-mirror on MPLS interface

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hilj
Hi, To my knowledge you will need a MS-DPC to do that and that is not available on MX80. //Daniel 2 okt 2012 kl. 13:14 skrev Leigh Porter leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com: Hey All, Does anybody know if the MX80 supports mirroring of MPLS family traffic? Ethernet, IP, CCC, VPLS etc all

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 port-mirror on MPLS interface

2012-10-02 Thread Leigh Porter
Ethernet, IP, CCC, VPLS etc all seems supported, but when I specify family in any filter of forwarding-options for port-mirroring there is no family mpls available. I think we need ERSPAN IETF draft, so you can export the original l2, regardless what headers you have afterwards. Why you

[j-nsp] Trigger Trap when interface is overloaded

2012-10-02 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Is-there an easy way (without accounting-profile / event-script) to generate a trap or a syslog when interface reach 95% of load (for example) ? Platform MX / release 11.4 Many thanks Best regards David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 -

Re: [j-nsp] Trigger Trap when interface is overloaded

2012-10-02 Thread Per Granath
Have a look at RMON. Is-there an easy way (without accounting-profile / event-script) to generate a trap or a syslog when interface reach 95% of load (for example) ? Platform MX / release 11.4 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Trigger Trap when interface is overloaded

2012-10-02 Thread david.roy
Thanks Yes I saw that but I'm not sure that this config is scalable and sometimes ifindex are not persistant after reboot. Best regards David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.com JNCIE-MT/SP #703 -

Re: [j-nsp] Krt queue issues

2012-10-02 Thread Benny Amorsen
Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com writes: Indeed, this is the worst thing this router can do. I have redundant routers sitting there doing absolutely nothing as this router's control-plane says everything is fine. I'm looking at using MX80 as an Internet transit router too... Do you know

Re: [j-nsp] Krt queue issues

2012-10-02 Thread Jared Mauch
On Oct 2, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Benny Amorsen wrote: Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com writes: Indeed, this is the worst thing this router can do. I have redundant routers sitting there doing absolutely nothing as this router's control-plane says everything is fine. I'm looking at using

Re: [j-nsp] Krt queue issues

2012-10-02 Thread Clarke Morledge
A very interesting thread. Does anyone have a good feel for how many BGP neighbors with a full routing table feed you can have before you start to hit this issue on the MX80? Are there other load factors involved? I assuming that the RE-1300 on the MX chassis units do not suffer from this,

[j-nsp] GRES on EX-Virtual chassis

2012-10-02 Thread Muruganandham M
Hello, I am referring the following link. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.3/topics/task/configuration/virtual-chassis-gres-cli.html Is it mandatory to configure the mastership-priority to 255 to enable GRES on the VC ? -- *Thanks* *Anand*