[j-nsp] Juniper OAC Home Settings

2012-10-03 Thread Rehan Rafi
Dear All, Hopefully you all are doing fine. One of our customer has a wearied requirement related to Juniper Odyssey Access Client that he don't want to use OAC at home wireless network and want to use Widows wireless settings to connect. If above is do able, knowing client does not have

Re: [j-nsp] Krt queue issues

2012-10-03 Thread Benny Amorsen
Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net writes: As far as the fallback 'default' route, if you are purchasing transit from someone, you could consider a last-resort default pointed at them. You can exclude routes like 10/8 etc by routing these to discard + install on your devices. That only helps

Re: [j-nsp] GRES on EX-Virtual chassis

2012-10-03 Thread Eugeniu Patrascu
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Muruganandham M sedhuan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am referring the following link. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.3/topics/task/configuration/virtual-chassis-gres-cli.html Is it mandatory to configure the mastership-priority to 255 to

Re: [j-nsp] Interop ISIS Cisco

2012-10-03 Thread EZ Joe
Hi, we gonna do it sometime next weeks. With Regard Joe - Via Aiped On 03/10/2012, at 11:42 PTG, Jeff Aitken jait...@aitken.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:49:42PM +0800, EZ Joe wrote: We have problems with Juniper and cisco ISIS peering. When we reboot cisco box, isis peering cannot

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper OAC Home Settings

2012-10-03 Thread Mike Devlin
Hi Rehan, If my memory serves me right, this is a Windows restriction, where it will only allow one service to manage the wireless connections. I remember trying to get OAC working for the office, and Windows for home on both Windows XP Pro, and Windows 7, where I eventually just gave up, and

Re: [j-nsp] GRES on EX-Virtual chassis

2012-10-03 Thread Luca Salvatore
I always configure my VC-EX switches all with priority 255. If they have different priorities you can't manually failover and as mentioned other weird stuff happens. Luca -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On

Re: [j-nsp] GRES on EX-Virtual chassis

2012-10-03 Thread Muruganandham M
Thanks all for your tips. When we have both nodes with the same priority 255, will there be any change in the mastership when both nodes powered off and powered on together? Further, is it mandatory to enable the no-split-detection in this case? Thanks. On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Luca

[j-nsp] JUNIPER POLICER and CoS Shaping Rate

2012-10-03 Thread GIULIANO (WZTECH)
People, Some topics where questioned today about how to limit traffic for vlan subscribers using MX5 routers. The main question is related to system architecture related to the main gear (internal machine) to control and limiting packets. Using policers (input or output) or shaping-rate we

Re: [j-nsp] JUNIPER POLICER and CoS Shaping Rate

2012-10-03 Thread OBrien, Will
The math for burst rate is a little odd. However it seems to average at around 10% of the desired rate. The burstiness (for lack of a better word) provides for a better user experience rather than a hard policer. Will O'Brien On Oct 3, 2012, at 9:55 PM, GIULIANO (WZTECH) giuli...@wztech.com.br