Hi Caillin,
I've not played with the MX for subscriber management specifically; however
Juniper released a PSN on Thursday detailing a special version of
code targeted specifically for these services.
PSN-2012-10-730 - 11.4X27 Release for MX Subscriber Management
All of the release notes and
Hello!
I need to monitor CPU load of every node in a cluster of two J6350 routers
via SNMP. I found KB12142 article which tells that Work is ongoing to support
these MIBs on J-Series and SRX Branch in a future release.
Currently my cluster is running JunOS 10.2R3.10.
Does anybody know is there
On 04.10.2012 14:30, Duane Grant wrote:
network-services all-ethernet;
Btw, it's unsupported thing.
There are ways to do it per IFL, but I don't have an example handy.
Last time i checked build-in ports of MX=80 did not support per unit
scheduling.
On 10/8/12 4:02 AM, Tima Maryin wrote:
On 04.10.2012 14:30, Duane Grant wrote:
network-services all-ethernet;
Btw, it's unsupported thing.
There are ways to do it per IFL, but I don't have an example handy.
Last time i checked build-in ports of MX=80 did not support per unit
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:27 PM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a simple setup like this:
[receiver] [ Cisco-rtr-A] [ Cisco rtr-B] - [MX960] -
[Cisco rtr-C] [source]
The receiver has joined a specific S,G, but this is very low rate,
perhaps just a
Hi John,
Is it the first packet that gets lost from the stream or the subsequent ones?
If the route does not exist on MX for your (S,G) in the forwarding-table, then
when you receive the packet for this (S,G) on MX, it will be punted to the
routing-enginer (control-plane) for what is known as
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Nilesh Khambal nkham...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi John,
Is it the first packet that gets lost from the stream or the subsequent
ones?
If the route does not exist on MX for your (S,G) in the forwarding-table,
then when you receive the packet for this (S,G) on MX,
Sure. Make sure you implement this workaround across all Juniper boxes that are
in path for this multicast group traffic.
- Nilesh.
From: John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.commailto:jneiber...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, October 8, 2012 2:40 PM
To: Nilesh Khambal
8 matches
Mail list logo