Julien, what you talk about is an entirely different story. IIRC, SRX
handles TCP RST differently than ScreeOS when a server closes a session. I
don't remember all the details, but something like not passing TCP RST back
to the user, just closing a session or something.
On the user experience
Hi Harry
Thank you very much, this is answer which i was looking for.
On Nov 8, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Harry Reynolds wrote:
If I follow, then no, a Juni router will not process and act upon the
contents of a received RA. It will generate them for use by hosts in
auto-conf. As I understand,
How about a generated default route on r2?
08.11.2012 12:18 пользователь Lukasz Martyniak lmartyn...@man.szczecin.pl
написал:
Hi all
Is it possible to configure router with ::/0 same way as hosts are
configured with IPv6 stateless autoconfiguration ?
This is what i would like to achieve:
Dear Expertise,
In my ISP we are investigating to use juniper MX as BRAS, i any one
can provide me with technical document that cover this point .
Thanx
shadi zein
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi Shadi,
Juniper published a nice 'Day One' booklet on using the MX as a BRAS.
You'll find a lot of info there as a starting point:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one/networking-technologies-series/dynamic-subscriber-management/
Rick Mur also wrote a
Hi Experts,
If i have a single EX4200 switch and i want to add a new EX4200 switch to
it using Virtual chassis capability.
i want to let the old switch as a master and the new one as backup.
i will keep new switch OFF.
on the old switch :
set member 0 mastership-priority 255
set member 1
It should work (tm), but generally I believe it is best practice to create
a VC on two unused switches but in your case if you have one in production
you may not have options. You could confirm with JTAC to get the best
official answer.
As mentioned in several other threads you should also
Hi all,
A month ago one of our M20 hung. The origin seems to be a issues with
the CF. We are trying to locate compatible CF, but we are not finding
any 512 or 1Gb.
Do you have any recommendations (manufacturer, model)?
Thanks,
Isidoro
___
You can use the following too:
set virtual-chassis preprovisioned
set virtual-chassis no-split-detection
set virtual-chassis member 0 role routing-engine
set virtual-chassis member 0 serial-number [SERIAL-1]
set virtual-chassis member 1 role routing-engine
set virtual-chassis member 1
Yeah this should work, put this config on the current switch, load the new
switch on factory-default(if you have done any changes), connect the vc cables
and boot up the new switch
Regards
Abdullah Baheer
On Nov 13, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Giuliano Medalha giuli...@wztech.com.br wrote:
You can use
hello, experts:
i am trying to get following topology (l2pt) to work; basically i am trying to
get l2pt (layer-2 protocol tunneling) to tunnel lacp frames:
ex4200-1(ae0, lacp) ex4200-2(l2pt, pe) ex4200-3 ex4200-4(l2tp,
pe) (ae0, lacp) ex4200-5
from the perspective of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
