Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 VRRP issue on SRX100

2012-12-31 Thread Try Chhay
Thanks for all advice. [edit interfaces ] ge-0/0/1 { promiscuous-mode; unit 0 family ethernet-switching etc etc no luck for above command on SRX100. After changing to *packet base *for IPv6, the IPv6 VRRP seems to be working as expected. The higher priority is master and lower priority is

[j-nsp] QOS Design

2012-12-31 Thread Salim Amari
Hi Community, I am planning to start a QOS design for a network composed of JUNIPER M120 and M320 routers. The network will carry on mainly voice and data traffic. Could someone advise me for any interesting book or reference which contains best practices that helps to make a proper

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 VRRP issue on SRX100

2012-12-31 Thread sthaug
After changing to *packet base *for IPv6, the IPv6 VRRP seems to be working as expected. The higher priority is master and lower priority is backup. However, client still can not ping virtual IPv6 address while it can ping to each IPv6 on both SRX100. Do you have accept-data under family

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 VRRP issue on SRX100

2012-12-31 Thread Try Chhay
Hi, Please see the config as the follows: SRX100-A# show interfaces vlan unit 90 family inet6 address fe80::2/64; address 2001::2/64 { vrrp-inet6-group 2 { virtual-inet6-address 2001::1; virtual-link-local-address fe80::1; priority 110;

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 VRRP issue on SRX100

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/31/2012 09:07 AM, Try Chhay wrote: In the result client is unable to ping virtual IPv6 address. Any idea? Can the client pass traffic via the virtual address? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2012-12-31 Thread Robert Hass
Hi Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg. JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x) Rob ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Migration from IGP to e-BGP

2012-12-31 Thread tim tiriche
Thank you everyone. I will be going for confederations. Sincerely, -Tim On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Chris Morrow morr...@ops-netman.net wrote: On 12/30/2012 12:31 PM, tim tiriche wrote: I didn't mean confederations. yes you did, according to your diagram... May be a diagram would

Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2012-12-31 Thread OBrien, Will
uh, what? On Dec 31, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg. JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x) Rob ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Bedard
11.4R3 I believe. Juniper calls it MPLS Egress Protection for L3VPN Phil On Dec 31, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg. JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x) Rob ___