Actually, you have to do that on an MX also. By default, the virtual IP will
not accept anything destined for it (such as pings) unless you enable
accept-data. The "real" IP of the interface will respond, but not the shared
address.
Now, I have seen hokey setups before where people had confi
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> set vrrp-group 0 accept-data
Thanks a lot !. It helped.
I used VRRP earlier on MX where this is not necessary to make VRRP
work (but 10.4 on MX).
Is above command is SRX (JunOS-ES) specific ?
Rob
__
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:36:47AM +0100, Robert Hass wrote:
> Hi
> I have SRX100 running 11.4R6.5 and I cannot make VRRP working. I have
> configuration like below:
>
> admin@srx100> show configuration interfaces fe-0/0/0
> unit 0 {
> family inet {
> address 10.0.0.69/29 {
>
Hi
I have SRX100 running 11.4R6.5 and I cannot make VRRP working. I have
configuration like below:
admin@srx100> show configuration interfaces fe-0/0/0
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.0.0.69/29 {
vrrp-group 0 {
virtual-address 10.0.0.70;
pr
On 01/08/2013 04:47 PM, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Richard A Steenbergen
> wrote:
>> I did warn Terry about this issue before he gave that presentation, but
>> note that their performance requirements are MUCH lower than mine. The
>> graphs in this presentation s
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> I did warn Terry about this issue before he gave that presentation, but
> note that their performance requirements are MUCH lower than mine. The
> graphs in this presentation show 100-1000Mbps attacks and 45kpps
> attacks, which doesn'
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 08:10:45PM -0800, Eric Cables wrote:
> It's interesting that Flowspec was one of the presentations at the Bay Area
> Juniper User's Group in October, and heavily used by CloudFlare.
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/junipernetworks/flowspec-bay-area-juniper-user-group-bajug
I
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:33 PM, ahmad barakat
wrote:
>
> Dears,
>
> actually we enabled the logging on our Firewalls, 2-SRX1400 and 2-ISG2000 in
> stream mode and they send the log to a syslog server.
>
> we are facing a problem with the detailed report. because the log just
> appeared the ses
On 01/08/2013 04:43 AM, Christian wrote:
> I confirm Alcatel has also implemented flowspec on their device.
> On our side we also use it moderately on our backbone ; it is very easy
> to implement and much more powerful than rtbh.
^just
never is there o
I confirm Alcatel has also implemented flowspec on their device.
On our side we also use it moderately on our backbone ; it is very easy
to implement and much more powerful than rtbh.
Christian
Le 08/01/2013 05:10, Eric Cables a écrit :
It's interesting that Flowspec was one of the presentati
10 matches
Mail list logo
