[j-nsp] Junos spanning-tree patch cost method

Hi there! Is it possible on juniper ex4200 switches to change the stp path cost method from 32bit (long) to 16bit (short)? xxx@xxx# run show spanning-tree bridge detail | match method Path cost method: 32 bit Thanks in advance for your answer Regards, Mike

Re: [j-nsp] EX Switch Question

So is there anything reasonably priced in the Juniper lineup for this kind of situation or do we look at Cisco/other? If a bunch of MX5's doesn't fit the price expectation, than, I would say, Cisco/other. Looks like Juniper just did not much care metro ethernet. BTW, it's sometimes said, that

[j-nsp] Confusion about DSCP marking and rewrite rules

I'm still learning how Junos handles DSCP marking and I ran into a question based on something I saw in production. Let's assume we have an irb, and in that irb is an ae, and the ae has two physical ports in it. If I want to mark traffic on ingress, does it matter on which interfaces I configure

[j-nsp] Quick question regarding JunOS BGP

Does anyone know under what conditions routes will get into: State: Delete Ext I have almost 90,000 routes (bgp) like this, it obviously can cause problems when you combine this with uRPF loose. Thanks, -Drew ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

[j-nsp] QoS - to share a network control queue or not?

Greetings, I work for a company in the utility industry and we are building out a small MPLS network. Concerning QoS, we will offer our internal customers queues with different levels of service along with a network control queue (NC) for their own needs. Is it ok to mix a customer's NC with

Re: [j-nsp] QoS - to share a network control queue or not?

On 01/11/2013 05:08 PM, Eduardo Barrios wrote: Is it ok to mix a customer's NC with our MPLS NC? How do service providers handle this? that seems bad... now their bgp overrides your bgp (maybe) choking out the management and control of your network elements, leading to an outage of not just