Hello Group,
You might be able to help on that question:
It is written on this table (table 1), that EX4200-48PX does support PoE+
(802.3at/30W per port).
However, the PoE budget is equal to 740 W, which means PoE (740/48 = 15.4).
I am really confused.
Does this platform support full PoE+ on all
4200s can be given a 900 watt power supply (cant recall the exact wattage)
however form my understanding is that the current EX range can support POE+
but as you pointed out, the PSUs cant provide a full 30W to all ports.
So in essence, as I understand it we can have POE+ but not on all ports at
Is there any workaround like on Cisco by using RPS?
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Mark Menzies m...@deimark.net wrote:
4200s can be given a 900 watt power supply (cant recall the exact wattage)
however form my understanding is that the current EX range can support POE+
but as you pointed
I would strongly advise against the previous suggestion of not running
iBGP between the routers. While the topology in particular may
function without it, the next person to come along and work on the
network may not expect it to be configured
Hmm... really depends. I can easily recall
Hi all,
We are getting some messages on our MX router, regarding STP protocol
changes over over certain L3 interface (none bridge options configured over
interface), but we have not enabled the STP protocol at global level
The messages shows topology changes, with port state changes (Blocking
I have a couple of shiny new MX40s in my lab, and need to do some testing
before we deploy them.
They will be doing fairly vanilla BGP (~2 full feeds), IS-IS and/or OSPF, and
some interface filtering. No MPLS for now, but possibly in the future to
support L2VPN/L3VPN services.
What is your
If it's for a lab...why not run greatest and latest? if not, run the
recommended.
On 13-02-07 03:08 PM, Steve Feldman wrote:
I have a couple of shiny new MX40s in my lab, and need to do some testing
before we deploy them.
They will be doing fairly vanilla BGP (~2 full feeds), IS-IS and/or
if you can, I would go with at least the latest 12.1R. lots of bug fixes.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Gabriel Blanchard g...@teksavvy.ca wrote:
If it's for a lab...why not run greatest and latest? if not, run the
recommended.
On 13-02-07 03:08 PM, Steve Feldman wrote:
I have a couple
we are using here 11.4R6.6 and it was a good choice.
WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS.
Copyright © 2012 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved.
The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are
solely for the intended recipient and may contain
I second that, 12.1R. No problem for almost a year using it on an border
router with two full bgp feeds, two IXP feeds and lots of iBGP / OSPF.
Gustavo Santos
Analista de Redes
CCNA , MTCNA , MTCRE, MTCINE, JUNCIA-ER
2013/2/7 james jones ja...@freedomnet.co.nz
if you can, I would go with at
On Feb 7, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Steve Feldman feld...@twincreeks.net wrote:
What is your favorite version of JunOS for the MX5/10/40? Juniper is
recommending 11.2R5.5 this week.
11.4.r6.6
mehmet___
juniper-nsp mailing list
All,
Something has just been pointed out to me, and I'd like to get the
communities take on it.
It seems that Juniper has moved features to the Advanced Features License
in 12.3.
*This is the link for the EX License Overview on 12.2*
Hi Skeeve,
This has already been discussed in the Junos 12.3 Release Date thread
and a Juniper employee has stated that this is a documentation error
that will fixed.
Cheers,
Caillin
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Ahh sorry, didn't see it.
Excellent to know. Someone was trying to scare us ;-)
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;
14 matches
Mail list logo
