Is there a way to have more details about PSN 2013-03-868 ?
Tks
From: nitzan.tzelni...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 21:06:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX VC mixed mode experience
To: a...@oasis-tech.net
CC: dim0...@hotmail.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
The case with the 4550 in VC is
Ben,
The only reason I'm thinking about it right now is to give access to some
people who might want a pretty interface to look at stats. I doubt any
significant configuration would be done using J-Web (NO CONFIGURATION done by
those who NEED the J-Web interface).
Is there any reason to
Hello.
Brian, maybe use Cacti to have interface stats.
Tomek.
2013/3/4 Brian Johnson bjohn...@drtel.com
Ben,
The only reason I'm thinking about it right now is to give access to some
people who might want a pretty interface to look at stats. I doubt any
significant configuration would be
On that note I'll start a new thread on SNMP for MX series...
- Brian
From: Tomasz Mikołajek [mailto:tmikola...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 8:57 AM
To: Brian Johnson
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J-web on MX5 router
Hello.
Brian, maybe use Cacti to have
I am having a difficult time determining what MIBs to monitor on my new Juniper
MX routers. I come from a Cisco shop and know how to monitor CPU, memory and
(of course) interface stats. I'm having no issues with monitoring interfaces,
but cannot determine what MIBs to monitor for CPU and memory
A full set of MIBs are available here:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.4/topics/concept/juniper-specific-mibs-junos-nm.html
This MIB is is probably the one you want:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.4/topics/reference/mibs/mib-jnx-chassis.txt
They are versioned, I just
Josh,
I have looked through these MIBs and am still at a loss for which to use to
create Cacti graphs for system status (CPU usage, memory usage, etc...)
similar to the ones provided by Cacti for Cisco devices.
Any advice on this front? Is anyone else graphing this type of data with Cacti
On Mar 1, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu eu...@imacandi.net wrote:
I guess it has to do with the EOL announcement for the J series where the
SRX is promoted as the successor platform.
For full tables, the J series were the smallest Juniper routers that you
could buy and with 2GB of RAM
Brian,
I believe you should be able to use some of the following OID's to get what you
need to get started:
CPU - .1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.1.13.1.8.##WILDCARD##
Memory - .1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.1.13.1.11.#WILDCARD##
Redundancy State - .1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.1.14.1.7.##WILDVALUE##
SwitchOverCount -
Technically it's ~3.3GB due to the 32-bit limitations of the JSR Junos builds,
but yes ; )
On 05/03/2013, at 5:14 AM, Brad Fleming bdfle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu eu...@imacandi.net wrote:
I guess it has to do with the EOL announcement for the J
Anyone have any production time with the 8200 and MC-LAG? What code are you
running? Any
show stopper issues?
Thanks,
-r
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
11 matches
Mail list logo