hey,
I just want to let everyone know about the new behaviour for unknown
multicast that was introduced in junos 12.1 for EX switches. I'm also
looking for feedback from other EX users because we have been unable to
convince juniper to rethink this for 4 months now.
In 12.1, EX will now
Ingress ipv6 marking is supported on MX. You need to use 'then traffic
class'.
On Apr 1, 2013 2:25 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2013 10:55:11 AM Per Granath wrote:
On egress you may apply a rewrite rule to a class (on an
interface). Essentially, this
After an upgrade to 12.3R2.5 I still see errors for the power supplies, 3
messages per hour. The Fan/Blower alarms seems to be solved.
Mar 28 14:30:52 hostname chassisd[1308]: %DAEMON-5-CHASSISD_SNMP_TRAP6: SNMP
trap generated: Power Supply Removed (jnxContentsContainerIndex 2,
31.03.2013 18:18, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday, January 11, 2013 01:41:47 PM Pavel Lunin wrote:
Looks like Juniper just did not much care metro ethernet.
BTW, it's sometimes said, that the reason is a lack of
such a market in North America (where I've even never
been to, thus can't judge
Hey guys...
So I just bought a bunch of avago SFP+'s from a local distributor, about
250 of them, so I'm in relatively deep here.
I'm wondering if I just made a general mistake by adding another 20gbit of
MM OM3 with these new modules to an existing 20gbit AE which is using DAC.
I started
Hi all,
Has anyone ever experienced this error message on MX960 with a single DPC-E and
a single MPC2-3D? The MPC has a single MIC in it, a MIC-3D-4XGE-XFP. The DPCE
is a DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE. JUNOS version 10.4R8.5. The configuration that causes
the issue appears to be a VLAN-bundled logical
On 01/04/2013, at 5:55 AM, Mathias Sundman math...@nilings.se wrote:
I've just upgraded two of my MX5-T boxes to 11.4R7.5 and after that my 3rd
party 1000Base-T SFP (Transmode originals based on Finisar) started to show
Link Up as soon as the SFP is inserted (no cable inserted).
On
Epic fail on Juniper's part to think that networks will
still go for too big boxes for small box deployments.
The ERBU head promised that they were looking at a 1U MX80
box that would rival the Cisco and Brocade options in the
access, but I think they thought coming up with the MX5,
On 2 April 2013 09:06, Ben Dale bd...@comlinx.com.au wrote:
I couldn't agree more. Funnily enough when I saw the EX2200C-12 get
released being both fanless and shallow depth the first use case I thought
was ME NTU/Small PoP.
Front-mounted power would have been nice, but hey, I'll deal.
9 matches
Mail list logo
