[j-nsp] routing instances - ospf - summarization

2013-06-05 Thread n f
Hi all, I'm running junos 11.4 on a cluster of srx devices. I'm using two virtual instances, one for my internal networks and internet, and another one for a private network. OSPF is configured on routing instance1 (RI1) and routing instance 2 (RI2). I can export between routing

Re: [j-nsp] Inter-racks switch routing recommended practice

2013-06-05 Thread Ivan Ivanov
Hi, Here you check some ideas for using BGP in datacenter routing. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lapukhov-bgp-routing-large-dc-04 HTH Ivan, On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim ih...@grep.my wrote: Hi, I'm building an infrastructure which comprises of a few tens of

Re: [j-nsp] Internet access from VRF issue

2013-06-05 Thread Mihai Gabriel
I don't have the book with me right now to check, but I tried your setup without succes:) A workaround for this would be a generated default route on R4 when 8.8.8.8 exists in customer.inet.0 mihai@mx#run show route table customer.inet.0 0.0.0.0/0 exact customer.inet.0: 8 destinations, 8

Re: [j-nsp] DOM monitoring MIB

2013-06-05 Thread Jed Laundry
Apparently it is on 12.3+ according to http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.3/topics/reference/general/enterprise-specific-mibs-platform-support-junos-nm.html, but for anything 9+ you can add optic diagnostics to the jnxUtil tree with a timer-based event script:

Re: [j-nsp] DOM monitoring MIB

2013-06-05 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2013-06-05 22:02 +1200), Jed Laundry wrote: Apparently it is on 12.3+ according to http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.3/topics/reference/general/enterprise-specific-mibs-platform-support-junos-nm.html, The MIB OTOH specifically talks about XFP. And I know when XFP DDM is SNMP

Re: [j-nsp] Internet access from VRF issue

2013-06-05 Thread Ivan Ivanov
Hi, Did you try to configure policy matching those routes and use it for * vrf-export*? The other option that I am thinking is to use *auto-export.* Because BGP is advertising only the primary route. With *auto-export* the routes will be looking like not coming from BGP process. But this is not

Re: [j-nsp] routing instances - ospf - summarization

2013-06-05 Thread Pavel Lunin
05.06.2013 09:57, n f wrote: I can export between routing instances, but I'd like to know if it was possible to export via ospf from RI2 to other physical routers a single route that summarizes all the local routes I have. (like 10.10.0.0/16, as all the routes I receive via ospf on RI2 from

Re: [j-nsp] routing instances - ospf - summarization

2013-06-05 Thread Alex Arseniev
To export a summarized route, having at least 1 more-specific contributing route is necessary and sufficient. I.e. if You have 10.10.10.1/32 as Type-1 in OSPF area X, then creating a Type-3 summary (to announce from area X to any other area including 0) is easy: set routing-instances RIX

Re: [j-nsp] Internet access from VRF issue

2013-06-05 Thread Krasimir Avramski
Hi, Make R4 RR for R1 (family inet unicast) and it should work. You will have further intricacy on R3 accepting this route because R4 vpn-inet family will not reset next-hop self automatically. In order to fix this you should apply nhs for this route through explicit vrf-export policy. The

[j-nsp] M20 Interface throttled

2013-06-05 Thread Juniper Gowex
Hello, We have a Juniper M20 with JUNOS 9.3R4.4 and since few we have in our log these entries: /Jun 5 14:14:00.113 2013 xx ssb PFE_NH_RESOLVE_THROTTLED: Next-hop resolution requests from interface XX throttled// //Jun 5 14:16:30.122 2013 xx ssb PFE_NH_RESOLVE_THROTTLED:

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX480 BNG Feature ?

2013-06-05 Thread Tom Storey
f two or more people are trying to share the same IP on an on-demand type basis, then the router needs to keep some kind of session table to be able to return traffic to the correct end user should something come by at a random interval. And this is essentially what NAT is doing anyway, so

[j-nsp] M120 - Netflow/Jflow Export

2013-06-05 Thread Jake Jake
Hi All, Is it possible to export netflow/jflow from a M120 router(Junos 11.1) to an external netflow analyser on the network without a Multiservice PIC installed? It would be great with a sample configuration that need to be applied on the router. Thanks.

Re: [j-nsp] Inter-racks switch routing recommended practice

2013-06-05 Thread Jeff Wheeler
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim ih...@grep.my wrote: I'm thinking multi-areas OSPF/v3 but would a flat OSPF area 0 topology with BGP make more sense? I don't have a lot of exposure in dense datacenter routing so I'm bringing the conventional WAN routing thinking cap into

Re: [j-nsp] Inter-racks switch routing recommended practice

2013-06-05 Thread Wayne Tucker
You should be able to run that many racks inside a single OSPF area - in fact, multiple areas can result in a lot of type 3 LSAs if you do not summarize properly. You can improve initialization times and keep the LSDB down to one LSA per router if you: 1.) Set the RVIs on the ToRs to passive (to

Re: [j-nsp] M120 - Netflow/Jflow Export

2013-06-05 Thread Chris Kawchuk
RE based Sampling: http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Cflowd_configuration - CK. On 06/06/2013, at 9:01 AM, Jake Jake 2012j...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Is it possible to export netflow/jflow from a M120 router(Junos 11.1) to an external netflow analyser on the network without a

Re: [j-nsp] Inter-racks switch routing recommended practice

2013-06-05 Thread Morgan McLean
3300's require licensing for OSPFand I think once you've got that, you've got BGP. I would still stick with OSPF, though. On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Wayne Tucker wa...@tuckerlabs.com wrote: You should be able to run that many racks inside a single OSPF area - in fact, multiple areas

Re: [j-nsp] M120 - Netflow/Jflow Export

2013-06-05 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Jun 6, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Jake Jake wrote: Is it possible to export netflow/jflow from a M120 router(Junos 11.1) to an external netflow analyser on the network without a Multiservice PIC installed? You'll only get NetFlow v5, so no IPv6 nor MPLS support, and you'll restricted to

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX480 BNG Feature ?

2013-06-05 Thread Thong Hawk Yen
Dear Tom, Thank you for your feedback. I have been getting feedback from friends in the industry, that this is not quite possible. NAT is one of our options, we are just making sure all other possible options are being considered before we embark on NAT. Regards Amos Thong P/S : For members

Re: [j-nsp] routing instances - ospf - summarization

2013-06-05 Thread n f
Hi Pavel, This would be the best option, as I can also import the static route to OSPF. Regarding the loop, I'll check if I can keep the import from ospf RI2 to RI1, as I can't summarize the routes I'll learn from RI2 neighbor routers. thanks. - Mail original - DeĀ : Pavel Lunin