On Friday, July 19, 2013 02:25:28 AM Payam Chychi wrote:
Why not prepend the routes out of ur gigE? That way it
becomes the backup link and u can turn down bgp anytime
you want on the gigE without impact
Because many ISP's LOCAL_PREF the hell out of customer
routes, where prepending would be
For any of your MX-series router the limitations are :
- IPFIX (RFC 5101): inline J-flow supported on MPC only = 1 collector only
- Note that only J-flow v5 and v8 are supported on RE = 8 collectors (same for
MS-DPC)
-Message d'origine-
De : juniper-nsp
Many ways to skin a cat... personally i would use local pref for outbound and
as-prepend on the inbound and your golden
--
Payam Chychi
Network Engineer / Security Specialist
On Thursday, 18 July, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Tim Vollebregt wrote:
Hi Keith,
Yes, this sounds good. But to have the
Hi William,
Similar to Sticky DIP, there are two terminologies address shifting and
address persistence in SRX.
1. In address persistence. Junos OS will use the same source IP address for
different traffic types associated with the same source host. To ensure the
use of the same address,
Sry, wrong link, here's the correct one
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos-security/junos-security96/junos-security-swconfig-security/configuring-persistent-address-pool-example.html#configuring-persistent-address-pool-example
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at
Thanks for the all the replies.
We actually do some local-pref on some other upstreams for outbound but
discovered a small
wrinkle
in that the new connection uses a different bgp auth key so I have to create a
new bgp
group to handle this
connection.
So a new question arises, can I use
So 1 collector is actually 1 flow server? I read the documentation and it
says 1 instance -- which I took to mean address family. I can understand
having only a single collection instance, but it also seems logical to have
multiple flow servers defined in that instance.
I can get around this with
I think I may have been able to answer my own question. I stumbled across this
KB article which I think spells it out pretty well:
http://kb.juniper.net/KB20711
On Jul 18, 2013, at 2:04 PM, William McLendon wimcl...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
We have an issue where we have enough internal
8 matches
Mail list logo
