Hi Gavin,
I have a box sat on my desk and it's running a similar temperature:
admin@GB-DESK-TEST-UNIT> show chassis routing-engine
Routing Engine status:
Temperature 65 degrees C / 149 degrees F
This is running 12.1X44-D20.3.
HTH,
Graham
On 24 August 2013 09:46, Gavin Henr
Hi Gavin,
I have an SRX110H-VA sitting here doing nothing and is running at 57c.
One of my customers has one sitting in a closed cupboard with no airflow and it
is running at 72c, which is pretty high, but it has been running for a long
time now without issue.
Thanks,
Michael.
On 24/08/2013,
Hi all,
Just got one of these in for OoB management and noted it's sitting at
around 67 Celsius on a lab test bench with lots of space around it in a not
really hot room.
On latest 12.1X too. Others seeing this? When it goes to the DC I'm sure it
will be cooler due to Airton, but all its doing i
On 8/23/2013 1:04 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:38:34PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 23/08/13 17:14, Michael Loftis wrote:
Part of it probably has to do with SNMP. Pre-allocating the count
keeps the SNMP index ID's from changing when devices are
added/removed. ae0 is alw
Also, if software is smart it updates its SNMP indexes it has on record...I
know every custom script I've done checks to make sure its still looking at
the right interface, and if not it updates for it or marks the interface as
lost.
Curious about the line as wellits annoying.
Morgan
On Fri
Dears,
I
have two ex-4200-24 f running 11.4r8.5 software, connected through two VCP
ports, it was connected to mx router by trunk port and the uplink connected to
member 0.
The
customers connected to member 0(master) working fine , but when I add a
customer to member 1 ,I cannot access to the MX-
Dears,
I
have two ex-4200-24 f running 11.4r8.5 software, connected through two VCP
ports, it was connected to mx router by trunk port and the uplink connected to
member 0.
The
customers connected to member 0(master) working fine , but when I add a
customer to member 0 I cannot access to the MX-R
Heh, thats what I get for making an assumption!
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 23/08/13 17:14, Michael Loftis wrote:
>>
>> Part of it probably has to do with SNMP. Pre-allocating the count
>> keeps the SNMP index ID's from changing when devices are
>> added/removed. ae
On 23/08/13 18:04, Doug McIntyre wrote:
But imagine the case, where you start with needing 4 LAGs, so that is
what you set. Then you add in 10 SFPs for various things, and then you
add in 4 more LAGs, then you remove 4 SFPs for some other project.
What do your SNMP indexes look like now? And ho
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:38:34PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 23/08/13 17:14, Michael Loftis wrote:
> > Part of it probably has to do with SNMP. Pre-allocating the count
> > keeps the SNMP index ID's from changing when devices are
> > added/removed. ae0 is always index blah. A lot of tools a
Part of it probably has to do with SNMP. Pre-allocating the count
keeps the SNMP index ID's from changing when devices are
added/removed. ae0 is always index blah. A lot of tools are very
dependent upon the SNMP index ID.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> Just for curiosi
On 23/08/13 17:14, Michael Loftis wrote:
Part of it probably has to do with SNMP. Pre-allocating the count
keeps the SNMP index ID's from changing when devices are
added/removed. ae0 is always index blah. A lot of tools are very
dependent upon the SNMP index ID.
I don't think so TBH. Having
On (2013-08-23 13:30 +0100), Phil Mayers wrote:
> Just for curiosity - why is this a "thing" in JunOS? Why doesn't the
> platform just let you configure the aeX interfaces and figure out
> the "count" itself?
I'd love to hear this.
I also find it rather strange that we need to configure tunnel P
Try it like the below, terminating them on brocade gear and saw similar
issues. You might need to check MTU operation too.
set interfaces xe-0/0/1 description customer-3
set interfaces xe-0/0/1 vlan-tagging
set interfaces xe-0/0/1 encapsulation vlan-ccc
set interfaces xe-0/0/1 mtu 9216
set interf
Just for curiosity - why is this a "thing" in JunOS? Why doesn't the
platform just let you configure the aeX interfaces and figure out the
"count" itself?
It's such a specific thing to have to do I feel sure there's a reason,
but can't for the life of me guess what :o)
___
People,
We have an issue when implementing vlan-CCC in JUNIPER EX4550 switches.
When we put the port like the following mode:
set interfaces xe-0/0/10 encapsulation vlan-ccc
set interfaces xe-0/0/10 vlan-tagging
set interfaces xe-0/0/10 unit 600 vlan-id 600
When we close L2Circuit with non-JUNI
16 matches
Mail list logo
