Does anyone know if this is supported on branch SRX devices yet? The only thing
I can find is a thread from two years ago stating 'we are working on it' -
http://forums.juniper.net/t5/SRX-Services-Gateway/Terminating-q-in-q-on-a-SRX220h/td-p/104350
I'm trying to get the equivalent of the Cisco
Hi all,
Does anyone know if the from next-hop match condition is supported in
policies, applied to the forwarding table?
Thanks,
Vladislav A. VASILEV
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
LinkedIn
Muhammad Rehan JNCIE M T , JNCIE-SP ha solicitado añadirte como contacto
en LinkedIn:
--
Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn.
Aceptar invitación de Muhammad Rehan JNCIE M T , JNCIE-SP
Figured it out. My intention was to filter routes by performing matches
against each protocol next hop. However, this is not supported when the
policy is applied under routing-options forwarding-table export. Has
anyone seen this documented anywhere on juniper.net?
Regards,
Vladislav A. VASILEV
Hi Darren,
On 02/09/2013, at 7:34 PM, Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com wrote:
Does anyone know if this is supported on branch SRX devices yet? The only
thing I can find is a thread from two years ago stating 'we are working on
it' -
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:26:46PM +0100, Vladislav A. VASILEV wrote:
Figured it out. My intention was to filter routes by performing matches
against each protocol next hop. However, this is not supported when the
policy is applied under routing-options forwarding-table export. Has
anyone seen
Hi folks!
Does anyone use j-flow to colect router statistcs ?!
Is it a good idea use jflow?!
Enviado via iPhone
Grupo Connectoway
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
7 matches
Mail list logo