Much better to spend more $$$ in 9200 because it scales to 40G and
100G and because it uses a king if TRIO ASIC (other name and limited
FIB/RIB only) ... and it is prepared to SDN ... integrated to QFX5100
... so on ...
Giuliano Cardozo Medalha
Systems Engineer
+55 (17) 3011-3811
+55 (17) 8112-5394
Hi
As I would like to buy bunch of EX8200 + XRE I have question will EX8200 go
EoS or EoL in near time as it looks that EX9200 is good successor of this
platform.
Can anyone comment is good choice to still go for EX8200 or maybe better
spend few more $$$ for EX9200 ?
Rob
_
Any response to your problem from Juniper SE or JTAC ?
Good if they confirm that both licenses are required - then we just will
order them.
Rob
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Giuliano Medalha wrote:
> Robert,
>
> We did a bad experience buying only EX-XRE200-AFL.
>
> After the installation and
You might want to share your Junos version too
Being an EX, follow up Graham's suggestions with:
show log messages (filtered down to times during the event)
show spanning-tree bridge (check Time since last topology change/number of
changes - this is usually a culprit in pegging CPU)
On 8 Nov 2
Robert,
We did a bad experience buying only EX-XRE200-AFL.
After the installation and after a commit ... the system continues to
ask the EX8208 licenses showing warning messages at console.
We bought the licenses and we need to install it by hand using shell ...
The JUNOS version was 12.3R3.
Hi Sam,
'show chassis routing-engine' and 'show system processes extensive' are two
commands to start with, when investigating this issue.
The second command will show you what process is consuming resources etc.
HTH,
Graham
On 8 November 2013 13:51, Samol wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> CPU on EX4200
Hi All,
CPU on EX4200 run up to 100% for a period of time and I have not yet found
what caused this. Based on your experiences, what are the things that can
cause this and what are the commands to check this ?
Thanks,
Sam
___
juniper-nsp mailing list ju
Hi Mike,
First.. Yikes!
Second - yes this is possible. It is perfectly legal to use FBF to bounce
across routing instances and still match security policy - just ensure your
security policy includes the source and destination zones for the *ultimate*
destination of the flow is correct - wheth
in trio qxchip is responsible for H-QOS. you can check it's memory
utilization thru this command:
hostname>request pfe execute command "show qxchip 0 memory" target tfeb0
SENT: Ukern command: show qxchip 0 memory
GOT:
GOT: QX Linkram : 0
GOT:Total buffers in use: 6 (0%)
GOT: Bank 0 in
Hello,
Multiple routing-instances with "next-table" statics is a supported SRX
configuration, see
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.1/topics/example/nat-security-mutiple-isp-configuring.html
You can "shortcut" packets between RI with lt-* interfaces as well, but
lt-* interfaces are
this output shows you how many queues have been consumed (and maximum
ammount of queues). actual packet's buffering happened on the mqchip. i
dont remebemer the command which shows you how many of packet's buffer have
been consumed. will try to find it.
2013/11/7 Scott Harvanek
> Thanks!
>
> S
Thanks!
So here's what I got, does this mean I'm not even to 1 % utilization
even with 1866 buffers?
##
request pfe execute command "show qxchip 0 memory" target tfeb0
SENT: Ukern command: show qxchip 0 memory
GOT:
GOT: QX Linkram : 0
GOT:Total buffers in use: 5 (0%)
GOT: Bank 0
At the moment I can't test it. Tomorrow I will let you know. Thanks to all
for the suggestion of the "vlan-tags" solution.
2013/11/7 Per Granath
> Not clear what you want to do, although it looks like "family inet"...,
> but would this work?
>
> # show interfaces ge-1/1/0
> flexible-vlan-taggin
Not clear what you want to do, although it looks like "family inet"..., but
would this work?
# show interfaces ge-1/1/0
flexible-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit 2 {
vlan-tags outer 3001 inner 2;
family inet {
address 1.1.1.1/31;
}
}
-Original
Does anyone know if there is there a way to see how much buffer
space/queue space is being used for shaping policies on the MX80 /
MIC-3D-20SFP? I can see queue status but I'm more interested in how
much memory is being consumed for shaping.
We apply some shaping policies per unit on interfac
Hi,
I need to connect an interface of an EX2200 with an MX5. On this interface
I do QinQ:
set interfaces ge-0/1/1 unit 0 family ethernet-switching port-mode trunk
--> interface to MX
set interfaces vlan unit 2 family inet address X.X.X.X
set vlans svlan1 vlan-id 3001
set vlans svlan1 interface ge-
Hi all,
I might have painted myself into a corner here, so I'm here looking for
options from people far cleverer than I.
Firstly, a bit of history.
We're using J6350s, and SRX650s, as "security devices on a stick".
Our Ms and MXs punt packets into a routing instance on the "security devices"
w
For any virtual chassis only two licenses are required - for master and backup
RE.
For the EX82-VC is the two XRE.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.
Hi
I'm planning to buy AFL licenses for my 2xEX8200 + 2xXRE200
(VirtualChassis) setup.
Do you need to buy :
2 x EX-XRE200-AFL
2 x EX8208-AFL
or just is enough as I'm running setup with XRE/VirtualChassis
2 x EX-XRE200-AFL
?
Rob
___
juniper-nsp maili
The EX4550 supports up to 8 interfaces in each LAG, while you have 12.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/concept/interfaces-lag-overview.html
However, that's not an issue there, since even though on the SRX side you
should have one RETH with all 12 interfaces, on the EX-VC since
20 matches
Mail list logo
