On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 01:01:40 AM Yham wrote:
Do you really think enabling NTP service on routers can
burdening them. I mean in hierarchical way where RR and
directly connected with ntp sources and then all PEs use
RR as ntp master and CEs further down use PEs as NTP
master?
Let
Hi guys,
is it possible to use flow-taps for lawful interception on MX80-48t ?
Does it require a MS-MIC-16G ?
Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Alex
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 02:32:05 AM Jared Mauch
wrote:
Everything you ask a router to do burdens it, including
adding new prefixes, increasing traffic through natural
growth and other things.
I'm happy to burden the data plane, because in basic terms,
that could mean that my
It's hardly a polished Lawful Intercept feature, but there's this:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Remote_port-mirror
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Alex D. listensamm...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi guys,
is it possible to use flow-taps for lawful interception on MX80-48t ?
Does it require a
On (2013-11-19 18:01 -0500), Yham wrote:
Do you really think enabling NTP service on routers can burdening them. I
mean in hierarchical way where RR and directly connected with ntp sources
and then all PEs use RR as ntp master and CEs further down use PEs as NTP
master?
It'll probably work
5 matches
Mail list logo