Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] NTP Sources placement in MPLS network

2013-11-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 01:01:40 AM Yham wrote: Do you really think enabling NTP service on routers can burdening them. I mean in hierarchical way where RR and directly connected with ntp sources and then all PEs use RR as ntp master and CEs further down use PEs as NTP master? Let

[j-nsp] Flow-Taps on MX80-48t

2013-11-20 Thread Alex D.
Hi guys, is it possible to use flow-taps for lawful interception on MX80-48t ? Does it require a MS-MIC-16G ? Thanks in advance... Regards, Alex ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] NTP Sources placement in MPLS network

2013-11-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 02:32:05 AM Jared Mauch wrote: Everything you ask a router to do burdens it, including adding new prefixes, increasing traffic through natural growth and other things. I'm happy to burden the data plane, because in basic terms, that could mean that my

Re: [j-nsp] Flow-Taps on MX80-48t

2013-11-20 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
It's hardly a polished Lawful Intercept feature, but there's this: http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Remote_port-mirror On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Alex D. listensamm...@gmx.de wrote: Hi guys, is it possible to use flow-taps for lawful interception on MX80-48t ? Does it require a

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] NTP Sources placement in MPLS network

2013-11-20 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2013-11-19 18:01 -0500), Yham wrote: Do you really think enabling NTP service on routers can burdening them. I mean in hierarchical way where RR and directly connected with ntp sources and then all PEs use RR as ntp master and CEs further down use PEs as NTP master? It'll probably work