Re: [j-nsp] smartctl for junos

2014-01-07 Thread Wojciech Janiszewski
Hi, You can read smart data from the shell using smartd with appropriate parameters, i.e. smartd -oa /dev/ad2 Please follow http://kb.juniper.net/KB13103 for more details. It is also possible to read smart data and execute smart tests from cli, by using hidden hard-disk-test command, i.e. request

Re: [j-nsp] smartctl for junos

2014-01-07 Thread Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
Hi, unfortunatly there is none. You have to remove the disk/SSD and install it in a regular system to read its smart data. You cant do this from JunOS, as you cant execute unsigned binarys. Am Dienstag, den 07.01.2014, 15:20 -0800 schrieb snort bsd: > hi all: > > there is smartd running on jun

[j-nsp] VPLS: site-range

2014-01-07 Thread Tom Storey
Hi all, Could someone validate my understanding (or lack of) about the purpose of the "site-range" command... >From the reading around I have done, the site-range basically indicates how many sites maximum can/should exist for a given VPLS. This tells the routers how many labels should be reserve

[j-nsp] smartctl for junos

2014-01-07 Thread snort bsd
hi all: there is smartd running on junos, but i am not able to find "smartctl" utility for smartd. thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MX and ipfix

2014-01-07 Thread Clinton Work
MX960 12.2R3 with BGP and IPV4/IPV6 is running ok so far. We hit PR876824 with ipfix sampling on one MPC type. The fix is included in 12.2R5. Clinton. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014, at 09:44 AM, OBrien, Will wrote: > It looks like I need ipfix to get full flows from MPCs on the MX. From > the Junip

Re: [j-nsp] MX and ipfix

2014-01-07 Thread joel jaeggli
On 1/7/14, 8:44 AM, OBrien, Will wrote: > It looks like I need ipfix to get full flows from MPCs on the MX. From the > Juniper site, it seems that I need 12.x code. Is anyone happily running it? > I've got 12 on some small SRX, but have been very conservative on MX code > loads. Been running 12

[j-nsp] Juniper Cisco DS-TE RDM

2014-01-07 Thread Alberto Santos
Hi list, I'm trying to setup a DS-TEM RDM environment, but as soon as I config RDM on the cisco side IS-IS does't come up correctly on Junos and it also keep complaining about the the subtvl for DS-TE. Jan 7 11:19:03.107022 ERROR: ISIS ignored a bad packet: L1 LSP id ..0004.00-00 from 00

[j-nsp] MX and ipfix

2014-01-07 Thread OBrien, Will
It looks like I need ipfix to get full flows from MPCs on the MX. From the Juniper site, it seems that I need 12.x code. Is anyone happily running it? I've got 12 on some small SRX, but have been very conservative on MX code loads. I use bgp, ospf, vrrp, mc-lag, and some routing instances. Wi