On 24/01/14 00:14, Ali Sumsam wrote:
Hi All,
I am using a SFP-10GBase-ER for my Cisco3750X for a 10gig link going to a
Juniper MX5-T router (10GE XFP)
I am receiving following logs on my Cisco3750X.
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te1/1/2: Rx power low alarm; Operating
value: -21.3
On 24/01/14 12:39, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Hmmm.. Is there actually a way on Juniper to adjust the output power though?
I'm not aware of any MSA optics (SFP, XFP, GBIC, CFP, etc.) that have
controllable power levels. Certainly if you're using a transmission system
there's probably an adjustable
This issue resolved by adding multihop stanza to neighbor, which is
pretty weird, as peers use directly connected interface IPs ...
Misak Khachatryan wrote:
Hello,
I have strange problem on my MX-480. From some time router suddenly
drops BGP peering with two customers and session doesn't come
Here it is:
neighbor xxx.xxx.98.74 {
description SCI;
multihop {
ttl 3;
}
import policy-statement_import_from_AS47623_to_AS49800;
peer-as 47623;
}
neighbor ::0:11::2 {
description SCI-IPv6;
multihop {
ttl 3;
}
import (
This is strange for directly connected peers on the same physical segment.
Is it possible to share your configuration and IP allocation for the connecting
interfaces?
Peer1- /127Peer2
Peer1---/30-Peer2
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp
This looks good and your type is external and the correct address family type.
You should have been good without multi-hop.
Brent
-Original Message-
From: Misak Khachatryan [mailto:m.khachatr...@gnc.am]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 8:59 AM
To: Brent McIntosh;
Yes, that's why it's weird. As additional info, the peers are Mikrotik
router in one case and Linux machine with BIRD in another.
Brent McIntosh wrote:
This looks good and your type is external and the correct address family type.
You should have been good without multi-hop.
Brent
Ok...I have both in my lab, will test tonight and see.
Regards
Brent
-Original Message-
From: Misak Khachatryan [mailto:m.khachatr...@gnc.am]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 9:38 AM
To: Brent McIntosh; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX-480 BGP Open message
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Alexandre Snarskii s...@snar.spb.ru wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:20:36AM -0700, John Neiberger wrote:
I ran into an issue yesterday that confused me, which seems to be a
weekly occurrence lately regarding Juniper CoS.. We had an interface
that was
Hi all
I have configured an IPSEC VPN between two SRX firewalls and it was working
well
Something occurred and the tunnel went down
I have checked the interface terse output and found that the st0 interface
was up/down
I removed the configuration for the st0 interface and configured it again
and
10 matches
Mail list logo
