Thanks so much,
now work.
Regards,
Carlos
On Mar 7, 2014, at 3:25 PM, Per Westerlund wrote:
> What version are you running?
>
> Not knowing the rest of the setup makes it hard to guess what it could be.
> Unless there are some filters on interfaces, I would suspect the DNS ALG, it
> has som
What version are you running?
Not knowing the rest of the setup makes it hard to guess what it could be.
Unless there are some filters on interfaces, I would suspect the DNS ALG, it
has sometimes caused problems. If you are allowed to make changes to the ALGs,
one thing to try could be:
[edit]
Hi all,
First of all, sorry my english is not so good.
I’m using VPN P2P in my network. In my Data Center, I have 2 SRX240 in cluster,
and my servers, my problem is with my Active Directorie.
the problem is, when I put one PC in the domain this PC doesn’t dynamically
register in the DNS, I ch
Dear all,
we are looking at QFX5100 at the moment and would like to know if
anyone can tell us about its stability.
The platform itself is relatively new, but our initial needs are quite sane:
* BGP
* OSPF
* Static routes
* MC-LAG
* MPLS P
We would likely increase this a bit over time as we bec
or maybe use 'sort -u' to only see unique matches; 'sort' by itself
would contain hit count per unique entry though . . . . but you get the
idea :-)
Regards,
Ge Moua
moua0...@umn.edu
University of Minnesota Alumnus
--
On 3/7/14, 6:16 AM, Ge Moua wrote:
quick & dirty 3-step to achieve said
quick & dirty 3-step to achieve said results:
1) save srx to set-style:
show configuration | display set | no-more
2) save output to plain-text for parsing
3) cat | egrep -i 'address-book' | egrep -i 'address-set' |
awk '{print $8}' | sort
caveat:
* one could put a shell / script wrapper aro
I don't KNOW why, but I realize that some want their entries sorted on address,
others on name; therefore it is in insertion order with the possibility to
reorder by ”insert …..” (or reorder externally, den delete and reapply content).
/Per
7 mar 2014 kl. 11:02 skrev Phil Mayers :
> Does anyon
Does anyone know why JunOS on SRX doesn't apply alphabetical ordering
for address-book members and address-set members? It seems rather
pointless to have them ordered by insert order, since they don't have
precedence - that all happens inside the policies.
(We care because we have similar conf
8 matches
Mail list logo