Re: [j-nsp] 12.1X for SRX

2014-08-24 Thread Darren O'Connor
Running 12.1x44 on a number of SRXs without major issues Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie From: juniper-...@grahambrown.info Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 14:47:59 +1200 To: ty...@adap.tv CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 12.1X for SRX Hi Quoc, Just to add

Re: [j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers, slow forwarding convergence

2014-08-24 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014, Olivier Benghozi wrote: Maybe you should wait. In 12.3R6 and before you can hit PR593444. But in 12.3R7 you will hit PR671136. Maybe in 12.3R8 it will just be slow, who knows... Good point, and thank you for the heads-up. I looked up that PR and it's listed as closed,

[j-nsp] 2x Full Tables on MX80 with virtual-router

2014-08-24 Thread Han Hwei Woo
Hi all, I'm currently using a virtual-router instance on an MX80 so that I can effectively run two different networks with different routing policies on the same router. I'm already using rib-groups to transfer internal routes between the two, but am looking to extend that to peering and