On second thoughts I don't like that example.
Here's an example for vlans policing:
set vlans MIVCC8256006 filter input MIVCC8256006-Limit
set firewall family ethernet-switching filter MIVCC8256006-Limit term Limit
then policer 100M-Limit
set firewall policer 100M-Limit if-exceeding bandwidth-
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 08:53:19PM +0200, Johan Borch wrote:
> Is it a good or bad idea to run IP transit (full table ipv4 & ipv6) in a
> MPLS L3VPN and rely on the MP-BGP to carry routes around or is it better to
> skip the MPLS part and run iBGP between the routers with transit links?
I'm very m
You can make use of policers and use them once or many times.
Every model should support policers however my experience has been on EX4200 &
EX4500.
Example from http://www.juniperlab.info/p/interface-rate-limit-on-ex.html:
1. Configure the policer
root@juniperlab# set firewall policer Policer
Hola, Juniper:
Me gustaría conectar contigo en LinkedIn.
Cláudio Duarte
Analista de Redes
Aceptar:
http://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=d3wVcPkVcz8MdzkUc3wScz4VdjR4imVLqnhxt6BSrCACmjdMr7h4nPoZumlbp6lOomxP9zwOnT9BoCRBrlZBt6BSrCAZqSkCpnhFtCVFtSlKbnhMpmdzoiRybmRSrCBvrmRLoORIrmkZpSVFqSdxsDgC
2 reasons immediately come to mind as to a good reason to run it in a VRF.
Firstly no need for RIB-groups!! :) Secondly you can separate your core /
manangement routes from public routes, this can act as another line of defence
(as well as good firewall filters of course).
-Original Mess
5 matches
Mail list logo