Re: [j-nsp] SNMP OID for last signalled LSP bandwidth

It just returns the current RSVP-signaled bandwidth, whether it was auto-bandwidth setting the value or not. Phil -Original Message- From: Vijesh Chandran Date: Monday, March 16, 2015 at 15:29 To: Phil Bedard, juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SNMP OID for last

Re: [j-nsp] MX/Trio, mirror IRB egress traffic with VLANs [OFFLIST]

I have not been able to figure this one out either. Very frustrating. If you do find an answer, please post to the list. Clarke Morledge College of William and Mary Information Technology - Network Engineering Jones Hall (Room 18) Williamsburg VA 23187 --

[j-nsp] Sflow on non-zero units for ELS style switches (EX4300)

Hi, In the past, I used to deploy similar configs on non-ELS switches, and they mostly worked just fine with sflow. sw# show interfaces xe-0/2/0 ether-options { 802.3ad ae1; } {master:0}[edit] sw# show interfaces ae1 description Trunked to ; vlan-tagging; aggregated-ether-options {

[j-nsp] vSRX Cluster ip-monitoring secondary address

I'm confused on where to physically or logically assign this address. I have declared my secondary address in the ip-monitoring stanza but the connected Router is receiving quite a few ARPs from this address because it's trying to ICMP for IP-monitoring purposes Issue is where do I expect the

Re: [j-nsp] how to see users

Thanks everyone. Very helpful Aaron -Original Message- From: Tore Anderson [mailto:t...@fud.no] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 5:46 AM To: Aaron Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] how to see users * Aaron aar...@gvtc.com I have a user a I've config'd. I see that I

Re: [j-nsp] MX/Trio, mirror IRB egress traffic with VLANs [OFFLIST]

On (2015-03-16 10:34 -0400), Clarke Morledge wrote: Hey, I have not been able to figure this one out either. Very frustrating. If you do find an answer, please post to the list. I got tip from Max, Eduard and Pete to use 'family any', instead of 'family bridge'. I didn't initially even

[j-nsp] AS65535 rejected in recent JunOS

Recent JunOS (13.3R4 - 13.3.R5)[0] have interpretation of RFC7300 where you should drop prefixes if AS65535 occurs in your ASPATH. I'm first to admit that we've done terrible mistake years ago by choosing 65535 as CE ASN, --- While Last ASNs are reserved, they remain valid ASNs from a BGP

Re: [j-nsp] AS65535 rejected in recent JunOS

On (2015-03-16 13:52 -0400), Jeff Haas wrote: Hey Jeff, PR 1069307 covers the fix for those branches to restore AS 65535 to use. Thanks. I'll work through our account team, in attempt to get 14.2R3 beta or other release with fix integrated. Bit of in hurry, as we somehow missed this in systest

Re: [j-nsp] AS65535 rejected in recent JunOS

I'm first to admit that we've done terrible mistake years ago by choosing 65535 as CE ASN, [...] But considering that in my biases I'm reading this wrong. It seems it would still be fundamentally against robustness principles to drop these prefixes. I think vendors would benefit on

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP OID for last signalled LSP bandwidth

Here is a snippet from an old script I had to get the snmp stats and current RSVP reservation. This first OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.2.3.1.1 you walk and it returns the names and dynamic OIDs of the ingress LSPs. The $1 awk returns is the specific OID associated with an LSP. snmpbulkwalk

Re: [j-nsp] vSRX Cluster ip-monitoring secondary address

hi all, I managed to resolve this issue as being down to the arp replies not being deterministic from the switch port-channel facing the secondary SRX cluster node1. i.e they would use the incorrect physical interface from the port-channel list, where the arp's are sourced from the lowest

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP OID for last signalled LSP bandwidth

Thanks Phil for reply. Is this really returning auto bandwidth stuff? The last signaled one? Regards, Vijesh Mob:669.777.8502 On 3/16/15, 10:35 AM, Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com wrote: Here is a snippet from an old script I had to get the snmp stats and current RSVP reservation. This first